The Teleprompter Visits Alaska

Teleprompterby Anniel9/16/15
There are two men in this nation I have been unable to hear because the sound of their voices makes me ill. One is Bill Clinton and the other is Barack Obama. The first time I ran into this peculiar personal trait was sometime in 1992 after the beginning of the national election cycle. I had come home and as I walked up the stairs I heard a voice on the TV that sent absolute chills down my spine, or maybe my prickled thumbs knew the evil I could sense coming. My husband was reading and paying no attention to the TV, it was just on. “Who is that speaking?” I asked.

Bear glanced up and said, “Him? I think that’s the Democrat Governor of Arkansas who’s running for President.”

“Please, turn him off,” I requested, ” I don’t know how I know, but he is a terrible man.”

Shortly after that we threw our TV set away and I never willingly listened to Clinton’s voice, not even when he gave the State of the Union addresses. I listened as Rush learned to imitate him and know how spot on Rush is, but Clinton’s real voice still leaves me ice cold.

The same voice thing happened to me when Barack Obama began his campaign for the presidency. The most I have heard his voice is when someone like Rush Limbaugh plays a film clip, and that leaves me even more freaked out than when I heard Clinton.

When Obama came to Alaska I knew that I would have to follow some of what he said because I wanted to be informed about his agenda and how it would affect life in my home. I heard a few things on the news, but decided to wait and look up his official speeches online. Surely I could stand to read his remarks, right? Oh, no, even that isn’t easy.

Did you know that when you look up the president’s official speeches online, they come complete with audience responses given in parentheses? He spoke to an audience in Kotzebue, above the Arctic Circle, on September 3rd. He tells a joke (laughter), he comments about the size of Alaska (laughter), tells more jokes (more laughter), tells the audience how he realizes isolation and poverty in the north can be very harsh (applause) and he’s accelerating production of heavy-duty Coast Guard Icebreakers in order to create jobs (applause), even though the ice is supposedly melting, (even more applause). I wondered if signs telling the audience when to laugh, cry or clap, are part of the choreography that attends Obama wherever he goes. Every other word is “I”, including that he is not the first president to come to Alaska, but he is the first president to set foot on ground North of the Arctic Circle (applause, as though that makes him a hero).

In that speech the president announced his vow to maintain and modernize National Parks, even those in Alaska. He touted ConnectEd which purportedly has brought high speed Internet connections to the 80 students at Nanwalek when they don’t have that service at home. was also touted, even though the majority of people in Kotzebue are covered by the Native Health Service. (More laughter and applause.)

Then the Climate Change schlep began. The people in Alaska and Kotzebue are living the horrors of Climate Change; there are longer more dangerous fire seasons (the big fire on the Kenai Peninsula that ravaged 8,268 square miles over a period of several years in the 1940’s, and the Millers Reach Fire of 1996*, which destroyed 37,000 acres, including homes and businesses, never happened, I guess); glaciers are melting faster (they’ve been melting since the last Ice Age, and the tidewater Hubbard glacier is actually growing rapidly; as for Exit Glacier, whose melting has Obama so upset, between 1815 and 1996 has retreated 6,549 feet, or a little over a mile in 181 years); the permafrost is melting; sea ice is melting; the seas are rising; the island of Kivalina is sinking into the sea; Alaska temperatures will rise 6 to 12 degrees (Fahrenheit or Centigrade? Who knows?) by the end of the century, destroying the native way of life and culture completely, ad nauseum. No more game, no more berries, whatever it is will be gone.

After however many minutes that all took, he got to the jaw-dropping part of his discourse, where I couldn’t believe the nonsense. He first told how Kodiak Island now has 99% renewable wind and solar energy. Sure it does. Most of Kodiak’s energy comes from Terror Lake Hydroelectric at a cost of 6.8 cents per kWh, the Pillar Mountain Wind Phase I Project at 11 cents per kWh, and, in a pinch, Diesel Generation at a cost of 28.9 cents per kWh. The cheaper one seems to be more efficient in the long run. I saw no mention of any solar power. By the way, Kodiak used to be referred to as “the Northernmost Island of Hawaii” because of its more moderate temperatures. The average minimum temperature is 35.7 degrees F, while the average maximum is 47.0 degrees F (1/1/1973 – 12/31/2005). Do you think the weather and temperatures might be a little different and extreme above the Arctic Circle?

Our oh-so-brilliant president challenged the residents of Kotzebue to follow Kodiak’s example and start their own renewable solar and wind generation projects. Or maybe they already have? Even my AGW believing family members admit embarrassment at such idiocy. “Ahhh, how- – – ahmm?” Is the common reaction. Indeed. How?

Let’s start with wind power. How long do you suppose windmills will last in the Arctic when the temperature hits 45 or 50 degrees below zero, or when gale force winds blow in, or there’s no wind at all? No matter what the windmills are made of, upkeep would be impossible. Metals shatter in such cold, bolts shear, and snowload doesn’t help any, it might even foul the blades. Natives generally don’t eat bird’s eggs because doing so will kill the next year’s baby birds. How will watching those precious birds get chopped up in the windmill blades affect the people and their way of life?

The idea of solar power is equally problematic. At such high latitudes keeping solar panels properly tracking is all but impossible. And then there are the months of darkness, what then? In the summer months would the birds and animals get fried as they do in other states? Cleaning and protecting the panels from dirt, wind, snow and cold would be round-the-clock work, especially in the Arctic. There are reasons Solyndra and other solar power projects have gone bankrupt and failed.

Reading the stupidity was bad enough, but mostly it was the whole level of silliness that was hard to compute. The worst part was listening to the continual praise and realizing how many of my fellow Alaskans think this man has a clue what he’s talking about.

I have been unable, as yet, to face the man’s talks to the Arctic Leaders Conference on Global Warming. I know he thinks we must take action or our cities will sink, the oceans will rise, and Deniers will have to be reeducated by the Consensus Scientists. His carbon footprint, like St. Algore’s doesn’t count, of course. He rolled into Anchorage with big jets, small jets, helicopters, automobiles, members of the press, and his general factotums all well supplied. I’m not certain how many teleprompters were used in all the choreographed events, but they must have performed well.

The best I can report in all charity is that the man Obama is remarkably silly.

* * * * *
*When the Miller’s Reach fire occurred in 1996, donations of all kinds, money, clothing, household goods, food, were sent to the Big Lake area by generous Alaskans. FEMA stepped in to coordinate relief efforts. One friend of mine told me members of his church donated a truckload of clean and serviceable quilts, many hand-made, blankets and other bedding. My friend was almost in tears when he told me what happened. He and another gentleman drove to Big Lake, which is probably about 65 miles from Anchorage, and carried all the bedding into the school where FEMA was headquartered. FEMA officials not only refused the donation because the bedding was not in “like new” condition, but THEY ALSO CUT EACH BLANKET AND QUILT IN PIECES AND THREW THEM IN A DUMPSTER so no one could ever use them. Not one FEMA official was kind enough to give them back. It has been many years since I have had any respect for “government aid” of any sort. There, I have always wanted to tell that true story. • (917 views)

This entry was posted in Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

23 Responses to The Teleprompter Visits Alaska

  1. Timothy Lane says:

    I can understand your desire not to listen to Slick Willie or Slick Barry. In fact, for quite some time now I’ve tried to avoid ever listening to any Democrat, and occasionally I’ve even thought of complaining to Rush that excerpting their remarks at lunchtime was NOT desirable. (In MASH Goes to Moscow by Hooker and Butterworth, , Radar O’Reilly doesn’t let his wife talk to Democrats because it makes her physically ill. Note that the William E. Butterworth who co-authored most of the later books in the series writes elsewhere as W. E. B. Griffin.) Nor is it a surprise that a narcissist who modified material about previous presidents in White House records in order to link them to him would also annotate his speeches with applause.

    • Anniel says:

      Can you explain how or why Obama became known as a great speaker? He’s not even a fluid reader, Teleprompter or not.

      His trip up to Anchorage left the municipality owing over $250,000 for overtime and associated costs incurred in shutting down businesses along his jaunts. The Feds won’t reimburse any of it so I assume our property taxes will have to cover the whole amount. We’ve been wondering if Obama paid for anything at all. Oh well, such is life in the fast lane.

      • Steve Lancaster says:

        I share your revulsion to the sound of both. Slick Willy we listened to for it seems like a century as atty general and then gov. We only let him build his library in Little Rock if he would promise that Hillary would never stay overnight on our soil again.

      • Brad Nelson Brad Nelson says:

        Can you explain how or why Obama became known as a great speaker?

        I take it that not many of you here have been indoctrinated into the cult of multiculturalism. It’s not so much what Obama says but what the listener brings to it. That was noted many times about the Obama candidacy. People read into him what they wanted.

        Not many here automatically get the warm-fuzzies just because someone is black (or Asian, or latino, or whatever). Parsing people that way is for lightweight goofballs. But we need to acknowledge the decades of emotional programming that has occurred in this regard. People really did think that by supporting a black president that they were somehow moving society forward into a better place and redeeming for past sins. And, most importantly, they thought of themselves as being wise and compassionate for doing so (or at least insulating themselves from charges of racism).

        This wasn’t about America. It was about mirroring narcissism. And it worked. But it worked only because of what the average American has become. He is fertile ground for stupid nonsense. It looks like stupid nonsense to us but to those programmed in Progressivism, it is an uplifting, almost transcendent thing.

        • Anniel says:

          Brad, That is truly scary. “Mirroring narcissism”, especially if it’s in an empty suit, explains a lot.

          • Brad Nelson Brad Nelson says:

            When we conclude that someone is “our guy,” the tendency is usually to forgive (or just not hear) their deficiencies and elevate (or just read into) the things they say that we like. This obviously happened with Paul Ryan, for example. He had a Boy Scout look and persona, and many had a “What a nice young man” reaction to him.

            Well, no doubt he is a nice man. But he’s a horrible conservative and is the type of Establishment Republican who is ruining this country.

            Right now people are reading all kinds of good things into Trump’s vagueness. They are forgiving (or not hearing) his deficiencies and elevating (or making up to suit their desires) the things he says that they like.

            To some extent, people have always been low-information voters and have voted for reasons quite other than making a careful calculus of a candidate’s strengths and weaknesses. Sometimes this works if we gain a good intuitive sense of someone’s falseness, as was obvious with someone like Clinton or Obama. But what if your intuitive radar is broken or mis-calibrated. Then (as many do) they will call evil good.

      • Timothy Lane says:

        First, Obama is the First Black President, and the synoptic media and the Obamacrats are unwilling to find fault with him. Second, his speechwriters gave him some good early speeches, such as his 2004 speech at the Democratic convention. Of course, there was no truth to them, but that hardly matters to his admirers.

        Incidentally, I’m doing this at my local library because my laptop went down Wednesday evening. Until we can get it repaired, my access to the Internet will be limited.

  2. Kung Fu Zu Kung Fu Zu says:

    I share your aversion to both men. When Clinton was running for the presidency, I quickly noted his lying ways and turned the channel any time his face appeared. Same with Zero, but I think Zero is perhaps worse than Clinton.

    As for renewable energy on Kodiak; perhaps Zero is referring to the bears for they certainly get all the energy the require from renewable sources . For humans, not so much.

    • Anniel says:

      Kung Fu,

      I met a taxidermist when I first moved to Alaska. The back door of his shop opened at the top of a long and steep flight of stairs down to his work area. He called me one afternoon to “show me something important,” and told me to come in the back door. I opened the door and came face to face with a Kodiak Bear he had arranged artistically so it’s teeth and paws were shown to great advantage. I don’t think I screamed exactly, but heart failure was a distinct possibility. I had always been around bears when I was young, but I have absolutely no desire to see a living Kodiak Bear.

      Several years ago an older man killed an attacking Kodiak with his only weapon -a pocket knife. Astounding.

      • Kung Fu Zu Kung Fu Zu says:


        I once saw a stuffed Kodiak bear, as I recall it was at the Anchorage airport. Not something I would like to encounter except in that preserved state.

        As to the man with the knife, I can’t imagine how he lived to do that.

        • Anniel says:

          Kung Fu,
          Mr. Moe’s tale is harrowing. Some of the accounts on line are filled with all kinds of FBombs, but the one below is pretty good. Moe had 7 hours of surgery, blood transfusions, over 500 stitches, broken bones, skin grafts, you name it, he had it. But in the end he had killed the injured bear with a $10 buck knife and one last haymaker of a blow. Then he had to go over two miles to find his friends and get help. Amazing story.

          • Brad Nelson Brad Nelson says:

            Imagine having that same bear skin hanging on your wall. I can’t imagine the wild meaning in that.

            • Anniel says:

              Mr. Moe actually did go back and bring the hide home. At one time it was hanging on his living room wall. I don’t personally find stuffed animals or skins very attractive on shelves or walls.

              But some folks do love that which they shoot.

              • Brad Nelson Brad Nelson says:

                I’d certainly think there’s some terrific meaning in having that particular hide on the wall. That was a real him-or-me situation. I don’t suppose he ever tires of telling that story and I don’t imagine that everyone believes him on the first try.

              • Kung Fu Zu Kung Fu Zu says:

                I would want that thing hanging in my house so that I was reminded everyday how lucky I was.

                Everyday after that encounter would go down as an extra life.


        He’s lucky some progressive didn’t have him tossed in jail for violating the Endangered Species Act or something.

  3. Brad Nelson Brad Nelson says:

    Everyday after that encounter would go down as an extra life.

    Very well said, Mr. Kung. You said what I couldn’t find the words for. You hang that thing in your den and indeed every day after is going to seem like a bonus.

    • Anniel says:

      KFZ and Brad: I might be glad for the extra life, but women, I think, tend to be more likely to avoid the remembrance. Although if I were tough enough to kill a bear that way maybe I’d change my mind. Hmmm, I’m not even tough enough to LISTEN to Zero, so there you go.

      • Brad Nelson Brad Nelson says:

        I suppose hanging the hide of a bear that you killed in hand-to-hand (hand-to-paw) combat on your den wall is more of guy thing, for sure. But don’t tell me that chicks wouldn’t dig the story and be impressed. 😀

        Question is, does he hang that there for himself, to impress other guys, or to impress the ladies? No doubt all three come into play. Which is primary? Well…I’m not sure.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *