Ten Transgender Truths

SellwynThumbby Selwyn Duke6/12/17
Whether you’re a lawmaker considering a “bathroom bill” or some other “transgender”-oriented legislation, or a citizen pondering a vote influencing the matter, you need the facts. The following are 10 “transgender” truths:

  • There is no sound science behind the transgender agenda. No “expert” can point to any physiological markers, in any given case, proving that at issue is a biological phenomenon and not a purely psychological one.
  • The “transgender” diagnosis is based purely on feelings relating to what’s called strong “cross-gender identification.” It’s no different from a cardiologist performing bypass surgery on a patient — without conducting any medical tests confirming heart disease’s presence — based solely on the person claiming he feels as if he has clogged arteries. Yet on this basis alone a psychiatrist may recommend that a child live as a member of the opposite sex and even, at some point, have body-rending “gender-reassignment surgery” (read: mutilation).
  • Strong “cross-gender identification” is defined as “gender dysphoria.” There is also “species dysphoria” — the sense of being an animal stuck in a human body — and Body Integrity Identity Disorder (BIID), the strong sense that a body part or parts don’t belong on/in one’s body (e.g., legs, eyes). All three disorders are defined by “feelings.” There’s no more proof that gender dysphoria has a biological basis than there is that species dysphoria or BIID does.
  • Yet it wouldn’t matter if there were. Many abnormalities are inborn, such as Down syndrome, cleft palate, spina bifida and sickle-cell anemia. Anomalies are the exception proving the rule of normalcy; moreover, biology doesn’t determine morality.
  • To re-engineer society (e.g., open bathrooms to the opposite sex) based on transgender claims is to subordinate the feelings of the vast majority of the population to the feelings of less than one percent of it.
  • Proponents of transgender bathroom social engineering argue that such people have been using the opposite sex’s facilities for decades without raising objections. Yet this only proves that these individuals — who convincingly pass as the opposite sex — don’t need a law to gain access. Conclusion: The push to open bathrooms isn’t mainly about access; it’s about changing the way people think. Social engineering is the goal.
  • Some of those pushing transgender bathroom social engineering are autogynephiliacs: Men who derive sexual pleasure from dressing as women. They can be confused with those genuinely gender dysphoric, despite having a different disorder. Such people likely constitute an inordinate percentage of those accessing the opposite-sex’s bathrooms and committing sexual abuse.
  • Telling schoolchildren it’s normal to live as the opposite sex is child abuse. It’s as if we told them it’s normal to be species dysphoric and live as an animal: It warps their sense of reality.
  • Allowing men claiming woman status into women’s athletic events, on the basis that “hormone-replacement therapy” eliminates any natural advantage, reflects ignorance. The intersex sports-performance gap is profound — the mile record for 15-year-old boys is better than the women’s world record. And boys’ running records surpass those for girls’ even among prepubescent children. Allowing “trans” men into women’s competitions is no different from permitting a 20-stone heavyweight to box as a lightweight because he identifies as a 135-pounder.
  • “Gender” and “sex” aren’t synonymous.  Even psychologists will tell you that “sex” is a biological distinction while “gender” is merely your perception of what you are. In reality, “gender” should only be applied to grammatical classifications (as it used to be). The quality of being male or female is properly known as “sex.”

Prejudice means to pre-judge and is defined as “an opinion formed beforehand, esp an unfavourable one based on inadequate facts.” For policy to not be based not on prejudice but principle, we must arm ourselves with the facts.

Selwyn Duke (@SelwynDuke) is a traditionalist media personality whose work has been published widely online and in print, appearing at outlets such as The Hill, Observer, The American Conservative, WorldNetDaily and American Thinker. Contact Selwyn Duke or log on to SelwynDuke.com • (528 views)

This entry was posted in Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to  Ten Transgender Truths

  1. Brad Nelson Brad Nelson says:

    Strong “cross-gender identification” is defined as “gender dysphoria.” There is also “species dysphoria” — the sense of being an animal stuck in a human body

    I knew my astrological Leo sign went deeper than that. I’m a lion stuck in a human body. Maybe a tiger. Lions in the wild are actually sort of a mangy beast. Tigers seem like they keep themselves up better.

  2. Timothy Lane says:

    There are also people who think that they shouldn’t have some body part, who want it removed. Reputable doctors won’t do it. It should be noted that a tiny number of people have deformities in their sex chromosomes. For such people, gender dysphoria can be legitimate. But otherwie, as you say, it’s just a matter of feelings — and liberals prefer to rely on those rather than science.

  3. Steve Lancaster says:

    Life is all about “feelings” to the progressive mind. They have a feeling that President Trump is evil–so therefore he is. They have a feeling that we should accept anyone from any third-world hell hole and give them our wealth. They have a feeling that America is the source of all evil in the world.

    Proven facts do not have any influence on their thinking and woe betide anyone who disputes their feelings about their religion of global warming/climate change.

    • Timothy Lane says:

      I remember Robert Reich describing a meeting that was very negative — but the other participants all denied this. His response was that’s how he felt about it, which was all that mattered. And I think this was back in the Clinton era, when he was Labor Secretary.

  4. Kung Fu Zu Kung Fu Zu says:

    More proof that “sports” is one of the principal avenues for introducing transgender insanity into the mainstream.


    This guy is mentally ill. He needs help, not positive reinforcement of his malady.

    • Timothy Lane says:

      Either ignore the claims of the transgendered and treat them as they really are, or get rid of the sexual segregation of sports and athletics. If a man can say he’s really a woman, then sooner or later most of the winners of women’s contests will be men claiming to be women.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *