Some Truth About Amnesty

Kunk Fu Zoby Kung Fu Zu
In my previous piece, I laid out why amnesty would be suicide for the Republican Party. With this and future pieces, I will rebut the claims that “immigration reform,” aka “amnesty,” would be good for the country as well as the lie that Americans demand to have the problem solved now.

For years, various groups have told Americans that the immediate legalization of the millions of unlawful aliens in our country would be not only good, but vital for the future of the nation. These proponents of “immigration reform,” aka “amnesty,” have tried to justify their radical proposals by mouthing pious platitudes such as “we need to take illegal immigrants out of the shadows” or  “we cannot have second class citizens” or “America is also responsible as we haven’t enforced the immigration laws properly” etc, etc. ad nauseum.

If you disagree with the amnesty crowd you are subjected to a number of slurs including that of being a racist. This tactic is commonly used by those who do not wish an honest and open discussion of the policies they support. Such ploys do not bother me and I intend to inject some facts into the discussion.

Consider the above-mentioned excuses/accusations leveled by the pro-amnesty crowd:

“In the shadows” — Have the people who mouthed that never driven by a home improvement center, equipment rental yard, or many other work places at seven or eight in the morning? On any given day, there are plenty of illegal aliens who are openly looking for work. Not only do they not hide, they have become pickier about the work they will and won’t do, thus extending their time in the light. Their children go to public schools paid for by citizens and legal residents.  They don’t seem to be hiding very well.

“Second class citizens” — They are not U.S. citizens in any sense, legal or otherwise.

“The American people are to blame because successive governments have refused to enforce the law of the land”— Try that argument the next time you are stopped by a cop for speeding. “Officer, you didn’t stop the others who were speeding, therefore you are to blame that I am speeding”. See how far that gets you.

We are told we need amnesty to stimulate the economy. But is there really a shortage of Americans for the jobs out there? According to the Economic Policy Institute, “the number of unemployed far outstrips the available job openings in the USA for averages of the months from December 2011 to November 2012.”

This only confirms what Americans already know. The country is going through a tough spell and millions of American citizens are looking for work. What about employing more Americans? Might that stimulate the economy while helping to cut the budget deficit, while at the same time giving millions of unemployed Americans the satisfaction of supporting themselves and their families?

Given the present situation, what do Americans think about the effects of illegal immigration on jobs?

  • 66% vs. 22% believe that more immigrant workers would make it harder for unemployed Americans to find a job. (National Survey conducted by Pulse Opinion Research, June 17, 2013)
  • 56% vs. 25% believe less educated workers compete with less educated American for construction, hospitality and other service jobs. (National Survey conducted by Pulse Opinion Research June 17, 2013)
  • 73% vs. 14% believe there are plenty of unemployed less-educated Americans to fill jobs here. (National Survey conducted by Pulse Opinion Research, June 17 2013)
  • 83% vs. 11% agree that businesses should try harder to recruit Black and Hispanic Americans, younger Americans and Americans with disabilities before seeking new foreign workers. (National Survey conducted by Pulse Opinion Research, June 17, 2013.)

When the question of policy arises, what do Americans want to be done first?

  • 84% of voters favor stricter border security to prevent illegal immigrants from entering the country and fewer than 13% oppose stricter border security.  (Fox News Poll March 4, 2013)
  • 92% of Republicans and 77% of Democrats favor stricter border security. (Fox News Poll March 4, 2013)
  • 69% vs. 25% voters favor requiring completion of new border security measures before making other changes to immigration policy. 81% of Republican, 62% of Democrats, 60% of Independents. (Fox News Poll March 4, 2013)
  • 58% vs. 32% of respondents favor full enforcement of border and workplace controls before considering issuing work permits to 11 million illegal aliens. (National Survey conducted by Pulse Opinion Research, June 17, 2013)

Americans’ priority seems to be pretty clear. Secure the border!! Perhaps that is something our representatives should do. • (1264 views)

Share
This entry was posted in Politics and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

20 Responses to Some Truth About Amnesty

  1. Kurt NY says:

    Yeah, that argument that legalizing will result in increased economic activity befuddles me as well. The illegals have the jobs they do for the most part because their employers don’t want to pay for FICA, etc, so sure, once legalized their employers are going to give ’em all raises and pay all taxes, etc (7.65% FICA, maybe 9.9% SUTA, .8% FUTA, .0034 MTA Tax, Workers Comp premiums on their real compensation, etc). So the odds are either they stay off the books (what increase in GDP?) or enter the overt job market and compete for what jobs already exist there with the 10%+ already unemployed in that demographic, which would leave the jobs they left to be filled by even more illegal immigrants who we will have to legalize in another couple decades.

    Heck, even the official estimates say the measure will lower average hourly wages. This all just seems a case of “I want to do this, so let’s just make some stuff up to make me look good”.

  2. LibertyMark says:

    Facts are indeed stubborn things. Unfortunately, arguing with Progressives is not about facts; it is about agenda and therefore propaganda. Hence the buzz phrases like “in the shadows”.

    We Conservatives tend to engage at the truth and fact level, when those we are arguing with do not have ears to hear what we are saying. For example, I recall arguing with a Lib during the debates leading up to the passage of O-Care. He threw out that wonderful propaganda he had learned so well: “We are the only first-world country that has not implemented universal healthcare.” What does that even mean?

    Is it possible for us to win the argument on facts? That is the question.

    In the meantime, to engage in a bumper-sticker-ism, here is an aphorism that resonates for me: “Progressives – plundering the worth of your citizenship one amnesty at a time.”

    • Kung Fu Zu says:

      Unfortunately Mark, I don’t see any other option. The country has been dumbed-down to such a degree that any time a conservative speaks to a liberal, he is educating the liberal.

  3. NC citizen says:

    After reading your article, it makes me wonder how the liberal minded can actually believe all their lies and how our politicians on both sides can see the results of polls such as the ones you quote and continue to fight each other. Neither party is serving their constituents.

    • Timothy Lane says:

      The key reason for the legalization of illegal aliens (especially combined with no more than a pretense of securing the border) is to “grow the economy” — or at least those portions representing the illegal immigrants and their would-be employers. For the rest of us, the results are unfortunate — but the Beltway Bandits only listen to the immigrant lobbyists and the cheap labor lobbyists.

    • Kung Fu Zu Kung Fu Zu says:

      I think the key to understanding this it that both parties are serving certain special constituents within the both parties, to wit, the politicians themselves. The actual well being of the largest number of Americans is of little moment to these scoundrels.

      • Timothy Lane says:

        The politicians, the bureaucrats, the lobbyists, and those interests (crony capitalists and government employee unions, for example) that these groups represent. These are the ruling class who use the increased power of government to exploit the rest of us.

  4. Kung Fu Zu Kung Fu Zu says:

    No matter what happens to Trump. He took the muzzle off the American psyche and started a vital conversation about immigration.

    This is why that is so important:

    Latest Survey Finds 25% of French Teenagers Are Muslims

    This is from a PJ Media article.

    And just for fun, I will include a link to another story which highlights the brilliance of our secular open-border leaders.

    http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/03/15/as-sweden-tumbles-in-international-league-tables-government-admits-poor-performance-caused-by-mass-migration/

    All one has to do is look at California to see an even worse result.

    As I have mentioned in the past, I served as a substitute teacher for some years in a very good school district.

    Some people who had nothing to do with teaching wanted to know how students of various ethnic backgrounds did. There was no question that those of “Hispanic” extraction were the worst students. Interestingly,the best were those from the Sub-continent, i.e. Indians.

    • Timothy Lane says:

      And people fail to realize the long-term implications of this Islamization. If a quarter of the teenagers are Muslim now, in a few decades (when they continue to have children, unlike the native French) it will be a majority — and eventually the reversal of the legacy of Charles Martel. The Camp of the Saints should be required reading.

  5. Kung Fu Zu Kung Fu Zu says:

    The link below is to an article which should cause general despair about the country’s future.

    http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/obesity-epidemic-at-new-high-costs-150b-a-year-hurts-military-recruiting/article/2633193

    This is further confirmation that many businesses have simply given up on today’s youth. They are simply not worth the trouble they bring with them.

    Is it any surprise that so many businesses push for bringing in foreign workers? Young, and not so young, Americans are too often a pain in the ass. They mix incompetence with high-self esteem. A very dangerous combination. Thank you Dimocrat Party.

  6. pst4usa says:

    I know, if we just have the government pay for everyone’s health care, that will fix everything. Then we can stop people from eating too much and we can force them to exercise. If we make one size fits all clothing and supply clothes as well we can kill all of those that do not fit into the clothes we provide, (we will give them a chance to lose weight first, before we kill them; one chance anyway). What to do about those evil rich people, they might just buy extra food? Just kill them too. Then we can institute a brand new idea, free bread, just stand in a tiny little line for a little itty bitty moment, and we can give people exercise and have some wise compassionate government employee decide if this person needs bread that day or not. It’s perfect win win all around. Sorry Mr. Zu I just could not resist.
    $150 billion to pay the health care cost for 2 billion people that are obese, somkein’ deal, I mean if it only cost $75 per person to cover their obesity, then who cares if they are obese, $75 per year, that’s nothing. Me thinks their numbers might be off just a bit.

    • Timothy Lane says:

      2 billion people? Maybe worldwide, but I doubt that’s what the $150 billion was based on.

    • Kung Fu Zu Kung Fu Zu says:

      Pat,

      While obesity is a big problem, I was just as, or even more, depressed by the other reasons today’s yutes are not fit to serve in the military, i.e. “criminal records, drug use and educational deficits.”

      That 70% number is not good.

    • Brad Nelson Brad Nelson says:

      If we make one size fits all clothing and supply clothes as well we can kill all of those that do not fit into the clothes we provide, (we will give them a chance to lose weight first, before we kill them; one chance anyway).

      This is always the option of forced liposuction, Pat. This is one way, aside from state execution, to equalize weight distribution. And given the Left’s penchant for mainstreaming deviancy, I would expect that what would actually happen would be enforced lipo-inflation where thin people were forced to be a fat as everyone else. Then we’d all be equal and no one would feel bad.

      • Timothy Lane says:

        So this means Procrustes would be in charge of our healthcare. Where is Theseus now that we need him?

      • Steve Lancaster says:

        Ok, to be 100% fair and equal all NBA players over the average height must have their legs shortened to match the average, baseball players who hit over the average are reduced to only one strike and out, there are no balls every pitch is a strike. Those who do not meet average get extra strikes and 1 ball is a walk.
        then there is tennis, football soccer, and any other sport where skill and ability mean something just fill in the blank

        • Timothy Lane says:

          In other words, “Harrison Bergeron” — liberalism taken to its extreme.

          • Kung Fu Zu Kung Fu Zu says:

            It is appropriate that the murderous enforcer of uniformity is a female. Most male tyrants are more interested in complete obedience than uniformity.

            Interestingly, some of those societies where uniformity has been held at a premium are societies where perversion is fairly common. Think Sparta and Japan during the Bakufu era.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *