Separation of Church and State?

ReligiousFreedomby Leigh Bravo  10/31/14
Is there really a separation of church and state and has the current administration honored it? Have Democrats around the country been stepping on our rights to Religious freedom?

In February, President Obama spoke at the National Prayer Breakfast and said,

 “It’s also clear that around the world, freedom of religion is under threat…..No society can truly succeed unless it guarantees the rights of all its people, including religious minorities.”

But is that being practiced here in the United States? Are our religious freedoms being taken from us one day at a time? We continue to see case after case where this “separation” has been challenged.

Recently in Houston, the mayor, Annise Parker, started quite a firestorm when she demanded local pastors be served with subpoenas in regards to the Houston Equal Rights Ordinance, (HERO), signed into law in May. The subpoenas were issued after the pastors filed a lawsuit over a provision in the ordinance, which would allow men, who identify as women, to use women’s bathrooms.

In a recent article by Dylan Baddour of PolitiFact, Texas, the mayor of Houston, Annise Parker, instructed officials to issue subpoenas to local pastor’s requesting,

  • “All speeches, presentations, or sermons related to Houston Equal Rights Ordinance, (HERO), the petition, Mayor Annise Parker, homosexuality or gender identity prepared by, delivered by, revised by, or approved by you or in your possession.”
  • “All communications with members of your congregation regarding HERO or the petition.” (Writings, notes, diaries, electronic or videotape recordings, emails, instant messages, text messages.)

Jared Woodfill, who is representing the pastors said,

“This is a mayor who has waged a full-scale war on the churches in Harris County. These pastors are standing up and saying enough is enough and we are not going to allow it to happen on our watch.”

In response to the mayor’s actions, more than 1,000 bibles were sent to Parker’s office in protest.  In a press conference today, Parker announced that she is directing the legal department to withdraw the subpoenas.

Meanwhile in California, Governor Gerry Brown is demanding that all employers, including churches, offer and pay for elective abortion through their health insurance policies. The LifeLegal Defense Foundation and Alliance Defending Freedom are representing 7 churches in a lawsuit against the requirement. Casey Mattox, an attorney with Alliance said,

“Forcing a church to be party to elective abortion is one of the most unimaginable assaults on our most fundamental American freedoms. California is flagrantly violating the federal law that protects employers from being forced into having abortion in their health insurance plans. No state can blatantly ignore federal law and think that it should continue to receive taxpayer money.” 

In Idaho, city officials have demanded that ordained ministers must celebrate same-sex weddings or face fines and jail time. One case involves Donald and Evelyn Knapp, owners of the Hitching Post Chapel. They refused to marry a same-sex couple and as a result are now facing a 180-day jail term and $1,000 fine for each day they refuse to marry the couple. The city of Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, has a non-discrimination statute and recently the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals struck down Idaho’s constitutional amendment defining marriage between and man and a woman. Based on this, the city feels the Knapp’s should be forced to perform the marriage even though it goes against their religious beliefs. The Alliance Defending Freedom has filed a motion arguing that this action,

“Violates first and 14th Amendment rights to freedom of speech, the free exercise of religion, substantive due process and equal protection.”

In 2011, family members, visiting wounded soldiers at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, were prohibited from bringing Bibles or any religious reading materials to their loved ones.  When the policy was challenged by Representative Steve King, (R-IA), the medical facility rescinded the policy.

In 2013, The Alliance for Religious Liberty outlined many examples where the military restricted religious expression. In one extreme example, thousands of soldiers received “equal opportunity training,” where “Evangelical, Christians, Catholics and Orthodox Jews were classified as “Religious Extremists” comparable to the KKK and Al Qaeda. Those attending the training were also told, in writing, that they could not support these extreme organizations by fund-raising, recruiting, attending meetings, organizing or distributing literature.” In a letter by the Alliance, they stated,

“In other words, thousands of soldiers were told that they could not go to church, lead Sunday school, tithe, share their faith, or give out Bibles.”

Congressman John Fleming, (R-LA), introduced an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act to ensure religious freedom for service members and chaplains. The Amendment passed the House Armed Services Committee and another passed the Senate Armed Services Committee. However, President Obama said the additional provisions were  “unnecessary and ill-advised.” His advisors recommended he veto the Religious Liberty Amendment.

We, as Americans must understand and demand that our constitutional rights be upheld by the very government that was elected by the people, and for the people.  The United States Declaration of Independence, drafted by Thomas Jefferson and edited by the Committee of five, states,

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

Have these infringements on our religious rights been equally enforced? Have the same demands been made on local Mosques or Temples? Has our government become so politically correct that they create special privileges for some while infringing on the rights of others?

As Americans, we must insist, even with changing times, that the constitutional rights granted us by the founding fathers of this great nation, must remain intact. Our government must protect the “unalienable rights.” without caving to special interest groups, political favor, or a deteriorating morality. We must not allow the government to enforce or mandate any religious doctrines, not tell us how or what to believe. Although it is not written in the constitution, we have the unalienable right to a separation of church and state.


Leigh Bravo blogs at The Trumpet. • (1124 views)

Share
This entry was posted in Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Separation of Church and State?

  1. Rosalys says:

    Congressman John Fleming, (R-LA), introduced an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act to ensure religious freedom for service members and chaplains. The Amendment passed the House Armed Services Committee and another passed the Senate Armed Services Committee. However, President Obama said the additional provisions were “unnecessary and ill-advised.” His advisors recommended he veto the Religious Liberty Amendment.

    We don’t need any more laws guaranteeing religious liberty. We have the First Amendment. Period. So Obama thinks he can veto an amendment to an act passed by Congress and in his little pea brain it is the same as vetoing an amendment to the Constitution. Sorry, Barry – it cannot be lawfully done. Of course there are all sorts of shenanigans which can be performed under color of law or downright unlawfully!

    We have an unlawful government of usurpers. There is no rule of law. You cannot count on anyone in so-called authority to uphold the Constitution or any laws passed in pursuance thereof.

    We must never-the-less insist on rule of law. One hopes that people are beginning to realize that something has gone wrong and we need to get back on track; but most people can’t even tell right from wrong beyond what their feelings tell them. People need the Gospel and they must start reading the Bible to learn what God thinks is right and wrong, instead of looking to Senator Good Time Charlie and President Knows It All for guidance and direction. The blind are leading and the blind are following!

    • Timothy Lane says:

      Obama can’t veto a specific amendment, but he can veto the entire bill, of course.

      One thing to note about religious freedom is that liberals are quite willing (at least for the moment) to allow the freedom of any religion that doesn’t actively get in their way. This is why they don’t object to Muslims treating homosexuals far worse than even Westboro Baptist Church: those Muslims don’t actively oppose the liberal agenda, they just quietly ignore it. As long as they act that way, liberals are willing to “live and let live”.

  2. Anniel says:

    Thank you again Leigh for clarifying the hypocrisy around us. Kudos to all who are fighting the good fight.

  3. NAHALKIDES NAHALKIDES says:

    The underlying cause of the recent assaults on religious freedom is the hostility of the Left for religion, because it sees (correctly for once) religion as an important part of civil life which it cannot allow to be independent of the state if it is to exercise absolute power. That is the reason why the Left is backing radical gays, about whom they could otherwise care less, in their quest to violate the individual’s conscience. And violating the conscience is the express intention of all these “gay rights” initiatives, as well as the Obamacare (and Moonbeam Brown) regulations forcing the financing of abortions by those opposed to them. By violating the individual’s conscience they demonstrate a power over his will.

    The sheer evil and tyranny here are worse than is generally understood – I would go so far as to say adequate grounds for a second revolution if there is no other way to stop the Left from forcing good people to violate their consciences by supporting abortion.

    • David Ray says:

      Interesting observation NAHAL.

      As for my former Marine self; I’d find a 2nd revolution therapeutic if an IRS/take-your-pick-of-Obama goon ever knocked on my door (the way they did Catherine Engelbrecht’s family). Hopefully, I’ll have the composure of an adult, instead of a liberal.
      Thus far, I’m required/relieved not to do anything rash or stupid which would shame my better company.
      However, I must say you’re right in that the pressure grows toward an “event horizon” . . . that break point of no going back.

      When I fully believe I can only expect anything other than an unending installment of this crap, well . . . we’ll see.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *