Results of the Black-Victimology Coalition

AlSharptonby Jerry Richardson12/22/14
On Saturday (December 20, 2014) two New York City police officers were assassinated in broad daylight in Brooklyn New York while they were sitting in their squad car in full uniform. What presumably was the motive for this assassination?

Officials say it was revenge for the deaths of Eric Garner and Michael Brown. Hours earlier, the suspected gunman warned in an Instagram post, “I’m Putting Wings on Pigs Today.” His reasoning: “They Take 1 Of Ours. . . Let’s Take 2 of Theirs.”
They Gave Their Lives

Who is responsible for this atrocity?

I say it is the Black-Victimology Coalition (BVC).

In October of this year (October 18, 2014) I wrote an article defining and describing the essence of terrorism that is being promoted and conducted by the BVC.

Here, again, is the roster of that America-disparaging coalition:

  • Victimology-media (Such as NBC, ABC, CBS, CNN, NYT, and Wash. Post).
  • Political-enablers (Such as Barack Obama and Eric Holder).
  • Communist-agitators (Both black and white).
  • Race-baiters (Such as Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson).
  • Victimology-organization (The NAACP).
  • Liberation-theologists (Such as James Cone and Jeremiah Wright).
  • Thugs (low-level criminal types who want to loot, steal, and mug)

The serious danger that the above listed BVC poses to American society is that they are collectively enabling black-protest tactics that are, in essence, no different from the tactics of terrorists or ransom-kidnappers.

The essence of terrorism is contained in two actions: 1) Demands with Threats; 2) Acts of violence to enforce demands.  Terrorism requires both these activities.  Violence alone does not give terrorism its frightful influence; violence must be preceded or accompanied by demands and threats, and the threats must be creditable.
The Black-Victimology Coalition

The major culpable political-enabler of the BVC not listed by name above who now has police-officer “blood on his hands” is New York City’s pro-communist mayor, Bill de Blazio.

“[December 21, 2014] There’s blood on many hands tonight,” Patrick Lynch, president of the largest police union, said late Saturday. “Those that incited violence on the street in the guise of protest, that tried to tear down what New York City police officers did every day. We tried to warn it must not go on, it shouldn’t be tolerated. That blood on the hands starts at the steps of City Hall in the office of the mayor.”
Blood on Many Hands

On the same day that President Obama announced his endorsement (September 23), the New York Times published an extensive investigation of de Blasio’s radical Marxist background, focusing particularly on his devotion to the Marxist-Leninist Sandinista regime in Nicaragua. De Blasio also has been a big supporter of Cuba’s communist dictator Fidel Castro and Zimbabwe’s murderous kleptocrat Robert Mugabe. He also expressed his support for “democratic socialism.”
—-
The New York Times should, perhaps, be congratulated for “discovering” de Blasio’s radical past and making it more widely known, but it would be interesting to read transcript’s of the Times’ editorial discussions and e-mails explaining why they did not publish this damaging material until after de Blasio had won the Democratic primary and, essentially, sewn up the mayoral race.
Bill de Blasio’s Pro-Communist background

There are two constant rhetorical refrains that continually issue from the BVC:
1) Accusations of racism against white America, and 2) We need a national “conversation” on race.  This rhetoric would be funny, suitable only for spoofing on Saturday Night Live, if it weren’t so dishonest, divisive, and explosively dangerous.

There is an old saying in the scientific world that “if a theory proves everything then it proves nothing”; this is exactly the status that the ridiculous accusations of racism issuing from the BVC have reached.

Virtually any action or statement, especially from white society, that members of the BVC disapprove-of are promptly labeled as “racist.”  That’s why the term no longer has any meaning—when a term can mean anything then logically it actually means nothing—but here’s the dangerous part of this rhetoric: There are numerous cowards and appeasers, in high places in our nation, who fear this label; and they fear it so greatly that their fear gives the BVC a blackmailing tool: “If you displease us we will label you racist”!  This blackmailing tool has worked well-enough to make race-hustlers such as Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson wealthy and powerful. Let’s call this divisive race-hustling what it is: Pure evil.

As to having a “conversation” on race, it has become patently obvious, every time an honest effort to have such a “conversation” has taken place, that what the BVC really means by a “conversation” is that they wish to issue a monologue chock-full of their self-serving demands as to what America must do in order to “solve” the “problem” of racism.

Their talking-point monologue never includes listening to suggestions from anyone, whites or conservative blacks who speak-out. The BVC is not interested in hearing about the reality of black-on-white violence (such as the knock-out game) or black racism, or about the unfairness of affirmative-action, aka preferential treatment; or about the serious flaws that exist today in black society, such as the dissolution of the black family, or the 70 percent out-of-wedlock birthrate, or the extremely high black-on-black murder rates in cities across America.

The BVC does not want an honest “conversation” which would have to include what the black-community can do to help themselves; no, the BVC wants any and all critics of black society to simply shut-up and listen attentively to their stuck-record monologue of grievance and victimology.

Al Sharpton has been the primary champion of this radically divisive and dishonest monologue effort; and up until Barack Obama was elected, the President of the US, at least publically, did not endorse this sort of blatant non-sense.  That has now changed:

According to the Rev. Al Sharpton, who has appeared frequently in St. Louis with the Brown family and delivered a speech at Mr. Brown’s funeral, Mr. Obama “was concerned about Ferguson staying on course in terms of pursuing what it was that he knew we were advocating.
Obama’s Words of Encouragement to “Protestors.” 

“Staying on course”?  Like with burning, looting, and associated violence; nothing short of domestic terrorism?  Sure, this is a typical example of “staying on course” for Barack Obama.

Sadly, race relations are worse now in America, with Barack Obama as President, than they have been in years…all thanks to the untiring propaganda efforts of the BVC.

It seems that a majority of the American people agree with my assessment:

[December 8, 2014] A poll released Sunday by Bloomberg Politics shows that a majority of Americans think race relations have worsened since President Obama first took office.

The poll found 53 percent of Americans think race relations have gotten worse under the country’s first black president, and that 36 percent say that race relations have stayed the same.

A paltry nine percent said race relations have gotten better.
Race Relations Worse Since Obama Took Office

 © 2014, Jerry Richardson

 • (1492 views)

Share
This entry was posted in Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

25 Responses to Results of the Black-Victimology Coalition

  1. Timothy Lane says:

    The Brooklyn murderer was a career criminal who had started his rampage by shooting his girlfriend, so the only effect of the cop-hating and race-baiting was to help him pick his targets. Still, Bill de Bloodyhands encouraged this crime with his rhetoric and with his eager alliance with Al Sharpton — and especially his failure to condemn Sharpton when the latter led a mob chanting, “What do want? Dead cops! When do we want it? Now!” The synoptic media have carefully ignored this so that they can present Sharpton’s insincere protestation of regretting the murders at face value. (Shortly after the shooting, obamathugs in St. Louis were chanting that they wanted to see “pigs in a blanket”.)

    Certainly there has been a lot of rioting by (mostly black) obamathugs in recent months (as there was after the Zimmerman trial ended in an acquittal). The inciters definitely bear responsibility for that — and even if the Brooklyn murders were simply the result of a thug acting in his own way, it’s what they had sought.

    • Kung Fu Zu Kung Fu Zu says:

      so the only effect of the cop-hating and race-baiting was to help him pick his targets

      This is probably true, as far as it goes. But I believe one of the more incidious aims of such cop-hating and race-baiting is to push mentally unstable people and those with an ax to grind over the edge. This technique is not new and has been used by demagogues for a long time.

      • Timothy Lane says:

        I would agree in general, though not specifically in this case. But this is what Sharpton’s marchers called for, and none of Sharpton’s fans objected, so the cops’ blood is on all their hands as accomplices. There was also a shooting of a policeman in Tampa (apparently not fatal), and there so far is very little information on that (particularly on the obamathug who did it).

      • Timothy Lane says:

        It occurs to me than an excellent example of the person poisoned by liberal hate-mongering is Floyd Corkins. He targeted the FRC because they were listed as a hate-group by the SPLC (clearly yet another example of liberal projection), and he was going to stuff Chick-fil-A sandwiches in the mouths of his victims because they were also a target of liberal hate-mongers. By contrast, whenever liberals try to blame crimes (any crime that happens) on those they hate (conservatives), they do so without any basis in fact.

  2. Brad Nelson Brad Nelson says:

    Testing. Oh, the joys of running a web site. The DreamHost provider sent me some sort of automated email saying I had been “migrated.” Apparently the site is up and working although internet browser caches may need to be flushed or something. Still working on it.

  3. Jerry Richardson says:

    Nothing illustrates Barack Obama’s racial hypocrisy better than his own words.
    Here what Obama had to say about non-necessity for being patient following the Ferguson riots:

    “There’s no reason for folks to be patient. I’m impatient. That’s why in the wake of what happened in Ferguson and what happened in New York, we’ve initiated task forces that in 90 days, are going to be providing very specific recommendations,”

    Obama on Dialogue

    Here’s what Obama had to say about patience following the assassination of the two New York City police officers:

    “I unconditionally condemn today’s murder of two police officers in New York City,” Obama said…Tonight, I ask people to reject violence and words that harm, and turn to words that heal – prayer, patient dialogue, and sympathy for the friends and family of the fallen.”

    Obama on Dialogue

    Andrew McCarty pointed-out the illogical presumption behind the request for “patient dialogue”:

    Dialogue is an exchange that takes place when there are competing points of view and it is reasonable to believe that both of them may have a point.
    Does the president really think there are two sides to this story?

    Obama on Dialogue

    Are the police supposed to conduct “patient dialogue” with murderous assassins whose avowed purpose is to shoot them dead?

  4. Jerry Richardson says:

    Can any good come out the reaction to the lies promulgated by the BVC?

    The only good that can come out of this wrenching attack on civilization would be the delegitimation of the lie-based protest movement. Whether that will happen is uncertain. The New York Times has denounced as “inflammatory” the statement from the head of the officer’s union that there is “blood on the hands that starts on the steps of City Hall”—this from a paper that promotes the idea that police officers routinely kill blacks. The elites’ investment in black victimology is probably too great to hope for an injection of truth into the dangerously counterfactual discourse about race, crime, and policing.

    The Big Lie of the Anti-Cop Left Turns Lethal

    • Timothy Lane says:

      The Big Lie will never be delegitimized among liberals because they are so emotionally invested in it due to its utility in inciting black identity-group feelings of victimization. We can hope that normal (i.e., non-liberal) people will realize how atrocious it is. Perhaps if someone sues not only Sharpton but his employer (NBC/MSNBC/Comcast) for the consequences of his racially inflammatory agitation (“What do we want? Dead cops! When do we want it? Now!”) it might help.

  5. SkepticalCynic says:

    I cannot and will never be able to understand the prestige and following that Al Sharpton and Jessie Jackson have. Are those that listen to and admire them stupid or psychotic? All the two of them are is a loud mouth. They have done nothing to aid the ones they presume to help, spreading hate and divisiveness every where they go. From what I have read taxpayer money funds this type behavior in many places in America. To think, if I owed the IRS what Al owes they would have taken every thing that I have and I would be in a federal prison, probably some gorilla’s sex toy. Yet, Al is running around spreading that vile poison that he spits every time he is on the TV. No wonder our cosmologists are looking for new worlds.

    • Timothy Lane says:

      Actually, I’m not sure how many people really follow Jackson and Sharpton. They do have a great deal of support among “guilty liberal” elites. In those cases, I think psychotic may be an accurate description. But I do like the way you ended your post. It explains a lot.

  6. Jerry Richardson says:

    The destruction this past week-end in Baltimore, MD is another result of the actions of the BVC (Black Victimology Coalition). There are certainly more Political-enablers than just Barack Obama and Eric Holder.

    The latest Political-enabler to appear on the scene is Baltimore Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake.

    What she said in response to the destruction from “peaceful protestors” is simply unbelievable:

    [April 26, 2015] Protests over the death of Freddie Gray, who died in police custody, took a violent turn on Saturday, resulting in dozens of arrests and widespread property damage. During a recent press conference, Baltimore Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake confirmed that the protesters were being given “space” to “destroy.”

    “While we tried to make sure that they were protected from the cars and the other things that were going on,” the mayor said of the protesters. “We also gave those who wished to destroy space to do that as well. And we work very hard to keep that balance and to put ourselves in the best position to deescalate, and that’s what you saw.”

    As author Gary Harrington tweets, “You have to be carefully taught to utter those remarks without the slightest sense of self awareness.”

    And Rawlings-Blake is more than willing to spread her worldview beyond Baltimore; as Wikipedia notes, “A member of the Democratic Party, she currently serves as secretary of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and Vice President of the U.S. Conference of Mayors.”

    Baltimore Mayor: ‘Gave Those Who Wished to Destroy Space to Do That’

    If there are any conceivable words and actions that should convince any fair-minded person of the subversive and dangerous nature of the BVC (Black Victimology Coalition) this should be it. Otherwise total “willful blindness” will prevail.

    • Timothy Lane says:

      The radicals have effectively destroyed Ferguson, and now they’re in the process of destroying Baltimore. Rush Limbaugh mentioned that fans at the Saturday night baseball game were told to stay there until the rioting was over. (Camden Yards is near the Harborplace, which is the big tourist attraction in Baltimore. The 1998 Worldcon, Buconeer, was held in that area, so I know a little bit about it.)

      • Jerry Richardson says:

        Timothy,

        Yes, the fans being locked-in the stadium was mentioned in the article that I read. Isn’t that frightening?

        • Timothy Lane says:

          I doubt it will encourage increased attendance, just as the destructive rioting of a major tourist area will no doubt have long-term effects on that industry.

          Personally, I think we should offer aggrieved blacks suitable compensation for slavery: Let them receive free tickets to the West African country of their ancestry, along with the equivalent of the average income or accumulated wealth there and whatever property (including money) they can take with them — in return for irrevocable renunciation of US citizenship.

          • Jerry Richardson says:

            Timothy,

            They wouldn’t be the slightest bit interested. All of them are Al Sharpton types; they are only interested in running an extortionist shake-down.

            • Timothy Lane says:

              Yes, but if the bill was handled properly (most especially being the ONLY compensation that would ever be offered) some of the rank-and-file might be willing to do it. And every single one who expatriated himself permanently would improve America (a process known as addition by subtraction).

        • Timothy Lane says:

          ESPN just reported that tonight’s game (White Sox at Orioles) has been canceled due to rioting. I wonder how often that sort of thing has ever happened. But it means that we were getting the sort of news coverage on ESPN than I would otherwise expect from Fox News.

          • Brad Nelson Brad Nelson says:

            No big deal. Games get cancelled all the time because of weather.

            Oh…you said “rioting” and I thought you said “rain.” What the hell is the world coming to. We’ve becoming like a third-world country of losers.

            • Timothy Lane says:

              Apparently they will decide tomorrow morning whether or not to play tomorrow night’s game. Baltimore blacks are busy Detroiting their city (to coin a verb), just as Ferguson blacks have already done with theirs.

  7. Jerry Richardson says:

    Another main-cog of the BVC, a Communist-agitators leader was involved in the Baltimore riot this past weekend. However one of the other main cogs in the BVC, the Victimology-media did not bother to report all the facts:

    [April 27, 2015] Major news media outlets have failed to report one of the main leaders of the “splinter group” of Baltimore protesters who turned violent is a notorious racist and the former national chairman of the New Black Panther Party, WND has found.

    The New York Times, the Associated Press, the New York Daily News, CBS local and other news media outlets all name Malik Shabazz as a leader of the breakaway, chaotic protests. Yet each of these news outlets only identify Shabazz only as “president of Black Lawyers for Justice.”
    —-
    CBS Local featured a photo of Shabazz leading protest chants in Baltimore yesterday, with a caption that identified the radical simply as “Attorney Malik Shabazz.”
    —-
    Not a single news media outlet quoted above informed its readers of that which a simple Google search of “Malik Shabazz” reveals. As highlighted on his Wikipedia page, until October 2013, Shabazz notoriously served as the national chairman of the New Black Panther Party.

    The NBPP was the focus of national attention after Eric Holder’s Department of Justice dismissed voter intimidation charges against the groups leaders related to the 2008 presidential election.

    The 2008 case centered on two NBPP members accused of standing in front of the entrance to a Philadelphia polling station in uniforms that have been described as paramilitary, with one member wielding a billy club.

    According to complaints, both men standing in front of the polling station pointed at voters and shouted racial slurs, using such phrases as “white devil” and “You’re about to be ruled by the black man, cracker.”

    Media Fail to Identify Leader of Baltimore Riots

    This on-going activity of destructive “protests” is nothing other than home-front terrorism.

  8. Jerry Richardson says:

    Home-front terrorism spreads from Ferguson, Missouri to Baltimore, Maryland:

    [April 27, 2015] Now, the anti-police sentiment we saw in Ferguson last summer and in December when two NYPD officers were executed in their patrol cars, is raging with Baltimore gangs joining forces to kill police.

    “The Baltimore Police Department/Criminal Intelligence Unit has received credible information that members of various gangs including the Black Guerrilla Family, Bloods, and Crips have entered into a partnership to “take-out” law enforcement officers,” a press release states. “This is a credible threat. Law enforcement agencies should take appropriate precautions to ensure the safety of their officers.”

    It should be noted the man who shot and killed NYPD officers Wenjin Lie and Rafael Ramos, was part of the Black Guerrilla family gang and traveled from Baltimore to New York City in December to carry out the crimes.

    Baltimore Gangs Join Forces to Kill Police Officers

    Home-front terrorism continues and the Obama Administration and their protective organization, the so-called Justice Department, continues to do NOTHING about it—except of course to encourage it.

  9. Jerry Richardson says:

    The situation that just occurred in Baltimore, Maryland this past week-end explains perfectly why Progressives/Democrats and their supporting cast of thugs oppose stand-your-ground laws.

    Videos of rioters wreaking havoc in Baltimore and photos of them risking the lives of innocents by punching, throwing objects, and, in one instance, drawing back a knife with which to stab a bystander were reminders that Stand Your Ground laws are an antidote for brazen in-your-face attacks on city streets.

    In a Stand Your Ground scenario, once an attacker has put an innocent’s life in danger, that innocent person may use lethal force to stop the attack. While these laws do not affect people peacefully protesting an incident or a situation with which they do not agree, the laws would affect rioters who physically attack innocents, if those attacks rise to the level of putting lives at risk.

    These laws take the burden off the individual being attacked by removing his or her obligation to try to flee the aggressor. Once the attack begins, the laws in “at least 22 states” recognize “no duty to retreat” before taking action to protect one’s own life. Under the paradigm of these laws, an attacker gives up his right to life by threatening an innocent’s right to possess the same.

    The National Conference of State Legislatures lists the states with such laws: Alabama, Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, and West Virginia.

    Not surprisingly, the destruction of property and risk to life that occurred over the weekend took place in Maryland–a state without a Stand Your Ground law.

    Moreover, Maryland law actually requires innocents to show they tried to flee–tried to retreat–while under attack before using lethal force against the attacker. This scenario gives every benefit to the attacker instead of the victim.

    UCLA School of Law Professor Eugene Volokh explains the legal interpretation of duty-to-retreat: “In duty-to-retreat states, the defendant is not legally allowed to use deadly force to defend himself if the jury concludes that he could have safely avoided the risk of death or serious bodily injury (or the other relevant crimes) by retreating.”

    Clearly, duty-to-retreat laws give the upper hand to rioters holding knives, sticks, clubs, and bar stools, among other possible weapons. These laws force innocent individuals under attack to turn and run–to flee before an aggressor–although all the while, they may remain under attack by that aggressor.

    Stand Your Ground is the antidote for this situation.

    Stand you Ground Laws: An Antidote for Baltimore-style Riots

    Of course, this is the very reason why terrorist-sympathizers such as Barack Obama and Eric Holder, and Progressive gun-grabbers such as Michael Bloomberg are adamantly opposed to stand-your-ground self-defense laws: They desperately desire a totally disarmed population. Why? Helps make a socialist state ALL powerful.

    • Timothy Lane says:

      I notice that Missouri isn’t on the list of stand-your-ground states. I wonder if the heavily Republican legislature will be interested in rectifying this situation. And I notice that Michigan (where Detroit was the scene of a devastating riot nearly 50 years ago) is on the list.

      • Jerry Richardson says:

        Timothy,

        Yes, I noticed that also. I don’t remember anyone in the media mentioning this. Wonder why?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *