by Jerry Richardson 12/22/14
On Saturday (December 20, 2014) two New York City police officers were assassinated in broad daylight in Brooklyn New York while they were sitting in their squad car in full uniform. What presumably was the motive for this assassination?
Officials say it was revenge for the deaths of Eric Garner and Michael Brown. Hours earlier, the suspected gunman warned in an Instagram post, “I’m Putting Wings on Pigs Today.” His reasoning: “They Take 1 Of Ours. . . Let’s Take 2 of Theirs.”
—They Gave Their Lives
Who is responsible for this atrocity?
I say it is the Black-Victimology Coalition (BVC).
In October of this year (October 18, 2014) I wrote an article defining and describing the essence of terrorism that is being promoted and conducted by the BVC.
Here, again, is the roster of that America-disparaging coalition:
- Victimology-media (Such as NBC, ABC, CBS, CNN, NYT, and Wash. Post).
- Political-enablers (Such as Barack Obama and Eric Holder).
- Communist-agitators (Both black and white).
- Race-baiters (Such as Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson).
- Victimology-organization (The NAACP).
- Liberation-theologists (Such as James Cone and Jeremiah Wright).
- Thugs (low-level criminal types who want to loot, steal, and mug)
The serious danger that the above listed BVC poses to American society is that they are collectively enabling black-protest tactics that are, in essence, no different from the tactics of terrorists or ransom-kidnappers.
The essence of terrorism is contained in two actions: 1) Demands with Threats; 2) Acts of violence to enforce demands. Terrorism requires both these activities. Violence alone does not give terrorism its frightful influence; violence must be preceded or accompanied by demands and threats, and the threats must be creditable.
—The Black-Victimology Coalition
The major culpable political-enabler of the BVC not listed by name above who now has police-officer “blood on his hands” is New York City’s pro-communist mayor, Bill de Blazio.
“[December 21, 2014] There’s blood on many hands tonight,” Patrick Lynch, president of the largest police union, said late Saturday. “Those that incited violence on the street in the guise of protest, that tried to tear down what New York City police officers did every day. We tried to warn it must not go on, it shouldn’t be tolerated. That blood on the hands starts at the steps of City Hall in the office of the mayor.”
—Blood on Many Hands
On the same day that President Obama announced his endorsement (September 23), the New York Times published an extensive investigation of de Blasio’s radical Marxist background, focusing particularly on his devotion to the Marxist-Leninist Sandinista regime in Nicaragua. De Blasio also has been a big supporter of Cuba’s communist dictator Fidel Castro and Zimbabwe’s murderous kleptocrat Robert Mugabe. He also expressed his support for “democratic socialism.”
The New York Times should, perhaps, be congratulated for “discovering” de Blasio’s radical past and making it more widely known, but it would be interesting to read transcript’s of the Times’ editorial discussions and e-mails explaining why they did not publish this damaging material until after de Blasio had won the Democratic primary and, essentially, sewn up the mayoral race.
—Bill de Blasio’s Pro-Communist background
There are two constant rhetorical refrains that continually issue from the BVC:
1) Accusations of racism against white America, and 2) We need a national “conversation” on race. This rhetoric would be funny, suitable only for spoofing on Saturday Night Live, if it weren’t so dishonest, divisive, and explosively dangerous.
There is an old saying in the scientific world that “if a theory proves everything then it proves nothing”; this is exactly the status that the ridiculous accusations of racism issuing from the BVC have reached.
Virtually any action or statement, especially from white society, that members of the BVC disapprove-of are promptly labeled as “racist.” That’s why the term no longer has any meaning—when a term can mean anything then logically it actually means nothing—but here’s the dangerous part of this rhetoric: There are numerous cowards and appeasers, in high places in our nation, who fear this label; and they fear it so greatly that their fear gives the BVC a blackmailing tool: “If you displease us we will label you racist”! This blackmailing tool has worked well-enough to make race-hustlers such as Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson wealthy and powerful. Let’s call this divisive race-hustling what it is: Pure evil.
As to having a “conversation” on race, it has become patently obvious, every time an honest effort to have such a “conversation” has taken place, that what the BVC really means by a “conversation” is that they wish to issue a monologue chock-full of their self-serving demands as to what America must do in order to “solve” the “problem” of racism.
Their talking-point monologue never includes listening to suggestions from anyone, whites or conservative blacks who speak-out. The BVC is not interested in hearing about the reality of black-on-white violence (such as the knock-out game) or black racism, or about the unfairness of affirmative-action, aka preferential treatment; or about the serious flaws that exist today in black society, such as the dissolution of the black family, or the 70 percent out-of-wedlock birthrate, or the extremely high black-on-black murder rates in cities across America.
The BVC does not want an honest “conversation” which would have to include what the black-community can do to help themselves; no, the BVC wants any and all critics of black society to simply shut-up and listen attentively to their stuck-record monologue of grievance and victimology.
Al Sharpton has been the primary champion of this radically divisive and dishonest monologue effort; and up until Barack Obama was elected, the President of the US, at least publically, did not endorse this sort of blatant non-sense. That has now changed:
According to the Rev. Al Sharpton, who has appeared frequently in St. Louis with the Brown family and delivered a speech at Mr. Brown’s funeral, Mr. Obama “was concerned about Ferguson staying on course in terms of pursuing what it was that he knew we were advocating.
—Obama’s Words of Encouragement to “Protestors.”
“Staying on course”? Like with burning, looting, and associated violence; nothing short of domestic terrorism? Sure, this is a typical example of “staying on course” for Barack Obama.
Sadly, race relations are worse now in America, with Barack Obama as President, than they have been in years…all thanks to the untiring propaganda efforts of the BVC.
It seems that a majority of the American people agree with my assessment:
[December 8, 2014] A poll released Sunday by Bloomberg Politics shows that a majority of Americans think race relations have worsened since President Obama first took office.
The poll found 53 percent of Americans think race relations have gotten worse under the country’s first black president, and that 36 percent say that race relations have stayed the same.
A paltry nine percent said race relations have gotten better.
—Race Relations Worse Since Obama Took Office
• (1492 views)