A New Transvaluation of Man and Woman

WhichEverThumbby Glenn Fairman   12/16/13
Living in the uber-tolerant society of the West, no one of any moral consequence denies homosexuals the right to assemble and live their lives in that state of relative freedom. But when we travel far beyond this and attempt to manipulate an institution deeply rooted in the inferences of nature and revelation, then we have truly untethered ourselves from right reason.

There is no reason that a mere 3% of the population that are identified as homosexuals should be the veritable tail that wags the dog — and therein, recalibrates our default notion of what it means to be male and female. From these sexual templates flow our notion of the family and these ripples extend out into every institutions and form our moral judgments relating to virtue and vice. If the truth be told, the jihad for the blanket acceptance of homosexual unions that are commensurate with the man–woman ideal is not strictly a homosexual agenda: for gays alone could not accomplish what is being accomplished by the present day cultural deluge. The target in sight is no less than the homogenization of mankind achieved through the obliteration of the Judeo-Christian apprehension of the world. This goal, ultimately, is the true prize that the Deconstructors of the West would have us zealously set to the flames.[pullquote]To stay coherent and survive as an intelligent race, we must ground the biological/natural institution of the human family and society on something more enduring than the capriciousness of homosexual romantic love or the sterile fetish for the human excretory orifice as a deconstructed utilitarian substitute for the female. [/pullquote]

According to those Progressive termites who serve as the ideological shock troops of societal decay, all moral judgments proceeding from ancient wisdom radiating across the entire history of the world have been malevolently wrong until the great and flowering tolerance of the decadent West made its appearance on the world stage. Such an unfettered idealism is the provenance of both arrogance and civilizational forgetfulness. To posit the definition of a group’s core identity, not on the firm bedrock of the natural, but solely on the carnal object of that group’s erotic desire, is a tenuous identity at best—and any attempts to sidestep nature for the shifting winds of political expedience are ultimately contrary to the teleological function of the twin sexes and as metaphysically sterile as the fleeting coupling of males.

To stay coherent and survive as an intelligent race, we must ground the biological/natural institution of the human family and society on something more enduring than the capriciousness of homosexual romantic love or the sterile fetish for the human excretory orifice as a deconstructed utilitarian substitute for the female. We must think logically and prudently while evading the hyper-egalitarian ramblings of our Progressive Sirens: those civilizational Berzerkers who are skilled only in unraveling and promoting their idyllic incarnation of the Unified Pathological Humanist Will – dedicated to their jihad to improve upon the fundamental blueprint of Creation with their own Synthetic City of the Perverse.

We are called to a standard more elevated than the quenching of our temporal passions and reveling in what seems right in our own solipsistic and depraved human hearts. It is the greatest of follies to affirm the politicized, hyper-egalitarian, and inherently emotionalist judgments of a decadent age by loosening structures which should have remained, as primordial boundaries, respected and untouched.
__________________________________________________
Glenn Fairman writes from Highland, Ca. He can be reached at arete5000@dslextreme.com. • (3898 views)

Share
Glenn Fairman

About Glenn Fairman

retired
This entry was posted in Essays and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to A New Transvaluation of Man and Woman

  1. Timothy Lane says:

    Yes, I’ve noticed that ultimately the goal is to demand moral approval. This is why the homosexual agenda is libertinist, not libertarian.

  2. faba calculo says:

    By now, I guess everyone knew this was coming.

    “There is no reason that a mere 3% of the population that are identified as homosexuals should be the veritable tail that wags the dog”

    What there is no reason for is the idea that there is some minimum number beneath which equal protection need not be enforced.

    “The target in sight is no less than the homogenization of mankind achieved through the obliteration of the Judeo-Christian apprehension of the world.”

    Ironic, since it is charges like this that seeks to present its opponents as a homogenous anti-West/anti-US/whatever conspiracy. For myself, the target is nothing more or less than equal protection of the law.

    “According to those Progressive termites who serve as the ideological shock troops of societal decay”

    Blah, blah, blah…

    “Such an unfettered idealism is the provenance of both arrogance and civilizational forgetfulness.”

    An arrogance common to anyone who ever looked at a feature of society they thought wrong, no matter how far back in human history it went, and who sought reform. However, in the case of gay marriage, no such sweeping judgment is necessary since the idea of civil marriage wherein the participants are expected to derive 100% of their sexual satisfaction was hardly a universal feature of the past.

    “To stay coherent and survive as an intelligent race, we must ground the biological/natural institution of the human family and society on something more enduring than the capriciousness of homosexual romantic love or the sterile fetish for the human excretory orifice as a deconstructed utilitarian substitute for the female.”

    Exactly no one is suggest that we “ground the biological/natural institution of the human family and society on” anal sex. At most, even if I were to otherwise accept your statement, we’re grounding 1.5% this institution on it. If you really think that so little an allowance is a threat to our existence as a an intelligent race, please say how.

    “We are called to a standard more elevated than the quenching of our temporal passions and reveling in what seems right in our own solipsistic and depraved human hearts.”

    Which is why so many of even those who had heretofore practiced the “art” of hook-ups eventually seek and allowed to enter into a pledge of permanent love, fidelity, and
    support that enjoy legal standing, which itself grants legal privileges not otherwise obtainable. And, lacking any argument against permitting gay to also enter into such legally recognized pledges that the mere assertion that it’s a threat to our sentience, they should be allowed to do so.

  3. Glenn Fairman says:

    Yes, we knew it was coming……and it was underwhelming……….

  4. Glenn Fairman says:

    Merry Christmas, Faba………..

  5. Brad Nelson Brad Nelson says:

    I’m still in awe over “human excretory orifice as a deconstructed utilitarian substitute.” It’s a bit too long for a bumper sticker though.

  6. Oh Glenn — “civilizational Berzerkers!” I may have to steal that line. This is one of those pieces that I suspect lowered your blood pressure when you got done. Bravo.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *