New Class Structure in America

RulingClassby FJ Rocca7/16/15
The Liberal Democrats encourage class warfare among the rich and the poor. They treat these groups as though they were collective masses of humanity, one mass poised against another. Their battle mantra is “Income Inequality” and the story they tell is a lie. The reason we do not understand it is because our system of free capitalism and individual initiative makes the issue of class moot. We have no class structure in the sense of a nobility, an aristocracy or a landed gentry. Here anyone and everyone has equality in the sense that they are free to pursue their goals, and, if they work hard enough they can achieve enough wealth to live a happy life.

But the Progressive Liberals, to buy votes, encourage the existence of a class of welfare recipients, distinct from those who work and pay taxes. In imitation of the very romantic but totally mythical motives of Robin Hood, who was an outlaw not merely for opposing King John and the Sheriff of Nottingham, but for being an outright criminal, stealing from the rich to keep what he stole, the Liberal Democrats have created a bloated structure of imagined entitlements to keep that class of welfare recipients voting for Democrats. But here is a flaw in their plan which is so glaring it is difficult to ignore, although Margaret Thatcher spoke it clearly. “The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people’s money.” They rob from the right to buy votes from the poor.

In a meritocracy such as ours in which free enterprise provides individuals with motivation to pursue their own life goals, the Liberal Democrats have recreated class structure to suit their aims. Now there exist three distinct classes; (1) those who produce wealth, (2) those who receive a portion of that wealth taken from the producers, and (3) a political bureaucracy to seize wealth from the producers and decide how to redistribute that seized wealth to the so-called underclass.

There is several problems inherent in all systems where classes are established. Movement upward in society is more difficult to negotiate when class membership is required for upward mobility, and eventually society stagnates from a lack of progress.

Welfare destroys motivation in both those who perceive it as an entitlement and in those from whom the wealth is stolen to redistribute. The first group is encouraged not to work because they get free wealth, while the latter group is also discouraged from continuing to produce just to have vast amounts if it stolen. Moreover, the bureaucracy must be funded in order to continue its own existence, so a large portion of the wealth seized remains to fund the bureaucracy. Today, as in centuries past, royal interests always precede those of the common people. In fact, it was once common for the King to seize lands and treasure owned by his subjects to fund his own projects. Sound familiar?

Government today acts like a royal body, especially with the Obamas living in the Palace. It is so big and pervasive that it now regularly neutralizes individual rights for its own interests. The difference is that in the US, government must seek re-election at regular intervals, so it is necessary to secure enough votes to remain in power. The most effective tool for securing that power is to pay for votes. Hence, welfare. Lyndon Johnson was no slouch when it came to political cunning. He said he would ensure the votes of black for two centuries through a gigantic welfare program that would become, and has become, generational.

The problem with redistribution is that it kills initiative among vast numbers of people, first of those on the dole because they are not required to work, consequently their motivation stagnates; and second among those who produce the wealth that is seized. Neither party gains and grows as a result. Only the bureaucracy benefits. Thus, the system eventually stagnates and collapse of its own weight.

The reason our nation became great was that class did not exist as a means to success. The poorest person from the poorest family in the poorest rural area could grow up, educate himself and become President Abraham Lincoln. At this moment, we seem to have forgotten that that our system of free capitalism and individual initiative makes the issue of class moot. We have no class structure in the sense a nobility, an aristocracy or a landed gentry. Here anyone and everyone has equality in the sense that they are free to pursue their goals, and, if they work hard enough they can achieve enough wealth to live a happy life.

Our problem now is that government has become so big and pervasive in almost everything it does, every economic manipulation and every effort at addressing the false problem of income inequality neutralizes individual initiative among vast numbers of people, both productive and unproductive. Soon enough, those providing the stolen wealth will stop producing and those who are dependent upon the dole will crash out of their own inertia. So will government collapse because there will be no one producing the wealth for them to seize.

There is a children’s story to illustrate this. When my sons were children I used to read Dr. Seuss aloud to them at bed time. One story in particular caught my fancy and has stayed with me for the past five decades. It is entitled Thidwick the Moose and is a kind of morality tale. Thidwick has impressive antlers of which he is duly proud. Other creatures in the forest also admire the antlers and see them as a spectacularly inviting place to make their homes. Thidwick, being a kind and generous fellow, gives permission to a bug to hitch a ride on his antlers. The bug takes up residence as a self-appointed guest and invites friends to join him. Eventually, several creatures are living in Thidwick’s antlers making various demands that tenants make on a meek landlord. Thidwick endures these indignities with a generous spirit, but is eventually ousted from his Moose herd because the other moose do not want to endure the same difficulties. Thidwick is so encumbered by his “guests” that he is barely able to escape the gun sights of hunters bent on mounting his head as a trophy on the Harvard Club wall, but, just as he is about to meet his demise, he remembers that it is time to shed his antlers and grow new ones. He casts off the old ones, with the guests still in residence. The hunters seize the antlers, stuff the guests and mount the whole thing on the Harvard Club wall.

The moral of this tale is too obvious. Unless we take measures to stanch the awful flow of our economic lifeblood and restore good old individual American initiative, the time will come when it happens, not to Thidwick, but to America.


FJ Rocca was born the day after Pearl Harbor in the same hometown as Johnny Appleseed. He is a trained classical musician, a published illustrator and a prolific writer of fiction and non-fiction. His website is candiddiscourse.com. • (751 views)

Share
FJ Rocca

About FJ Rocca

FJ Rocca was born the day after Pearl Harbor in the same hometown as Johnny Appleseed. He is a trained classical musician, a published illustrator and a prolific writer of fiction and non-fiction. His website is candiddiscourse.com.
This entry was posted in Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to New Class Structure in America

  1. Timothy Lane says:

    It’s odd that a solid liberal like Theodore Seuss Geisel would write a story that could be interpreted that way. But the important thing to remember with liberals is that their real orientation is for the political class. They rob the productive to buy off the non-productive partly to buy votes, and partly to provide the excuse for enriching those whose lives focus on Versailles-on-the-Potomac.

    • FJ Rocca says:

      I agree about Geisel. But under the surface, the Conservative in every Liberal lurks. Liberals actually have to turn off the spigot of rational thought to stay Liberal. I’ve seen it with friends who have gotten angry that my wife and I have made a rational point which upsets their rigid world view. We had someone stomp out of an Easter dinner (leg of lamb, no less, perfectly cooked on the outdoor grill!) because we had pointed out the imperious nature of Michelle Obama’s profligate spending on vacation–on taxpayer money. Our friend had just gotten finished bemoaning her own money problems and how her relatively low level of taxation was breaking her budget. If only she could keep a little more of the money… When I pointed out that the Obamas’ vacation budget for one year had been in excess of $15 million and that she was paying a part of that expense, she flew into a rage!

      In NY, where I used to work, I was surrounded by Liberals. Whenever I pointed out a logical absurdity in some policy, one woman with whom I worked would accuse me of racial hatred–even when I directed my remarks against Ted Kennedy! I assure you I am not anti-Irish. I married a woman who is half Irish! Nonsense makes Liberals run. Idiocy is the fuel of their weird faith. And hatred of us is the knee-jerk sustenance of their daily lives.

  2. Brad Nelson Brad Nelson says:

    The first group is encouraged not to work because they get free wealth, while the latter group is also discouraged from continuing to produce just to have vast amounts if it stolen.

    If there is an increasing gap between rich and poor, that is likely the reason. You have the ruling class and the dependent class. And a lot of “middle class” people stuck in the middle, hooked on entitlements, but still mostly living a productive life. And then one can seen the true extent of the monstrosity of the explanation of those who then say it’s the fault of not enough government redistribution when it’s the redistribution of wealth that has caused this split in the first place.

    “The poor,” much like homosexuals and illegal aliens, are considered the group you can’t criticize. They are victims and asking anything of them is to “blame the victim.” And the GOP Establishment is completely and thoroughly ensnared in this vapid ideology, thus they are useless in terms of reform. This is why Trump is making gains because he dares to tell at least part of the truth instead of hiding behind the cowardly “niceness” of, say, a Jeb Bush whose middle name should be changed to “Jeb Multicultural Bush.”

    If no one is willing to expose the unholy transaction between government and its citizenry, they can’t help but simply forward this gap between rich or poor which isn’t an economic gap but a class gap. And a class gap is inherently a psychological gap — it’s what you think about yourself, especially your limits. You have one group of people who think are better than the rest of us (and given how transparently stupid we are in terms of falling for their rhetoric, who am I to disagree?) and the other group who is becoming like the livestock class of the Eloi from H.G. Wells’ “The Time Machine.”

    As the degradation continues at the “Life at the Bottom” end of the dependent underclass, this gives all the more evidence to the Morlocks of the ruling class (whether talking Jeb Bush or Barack Obama…it’s all the same) that they are justified in wanting to manage our lives — whether they do so with an Establishment Republican smile or a Cultural Marxist sneer.

  3. Timothy Lane says:

    Brad, Milovan Djilas (a one-time Tito apparatchik, later disillusioned) once wrote a book, The New Class, about the Communist bureaucracies and leadership (the nomenklatura). I think the cover (if available) would actually make a good icon for this article.

  4. NAHALKIDES NAHALKIDES says:

    Sound analysis. The difficulty is in devising a strategy which cuts government size and power, the only way to dethrone this new aristocracy, when Establishment Republicans have allowed the Democrats to push the country so far to the Left that they may now be unbeatable in national elections (the “Tipping Point”). Buying and stealing votes has proved to be a very successful strategy for the Democrats.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *