It’s Official: The Democrats are the Party of the Devil

SellwynThumbby Selwyn Duke   11/12/14
Perhaps the first clue, or the ten thousandth, was when many Democrats opposed the reinsertion of God into their party’s platform in 2012 and booed the judgment that the measure to do so had passed. But now it’s official:

The Democrats are the party of the Devil.

Here’s the story, courtesy of CBS Boston:

Ruth Provencal is a devout Catholic whose favorite phrase when saying goodbye has now thrust her into controversy.

“I would say ‘thank you for voting, God Bless you,’” Provencal explains.

After serving as an election volunteer five times, the 67-year-old was told to stay home on November 4th, sacked by Derry [New Hampshire] officials who argued that her reference to God might be an illegal effort to influence voters.

“I just can’t believe that you’re telling me that I can’t say the word God,” she told the elections official. “Then she said ‘no you can’t.’”

My, it didn’t take long for the Democrat mantra to change from “Yes, we can!”

The article actually states that Derry election officials believe saying “God bless you” could be electioneering. Now, let me apply a little white male linear logic here. Since we don’t yet have a Satanist Party on the ballot (give it time) and I don’t believe one of the other minor parties was the concern, I’m going to take a wild guess and say it was thought that the alleged electioneering could be an influence with respect to one of the two major parties. And here’s what this means:

One of our major parties is so closely associated with godlessness, with evil, with everything so antithetical to the divine that even the mere mention of God’s name in a polling place constitutes a message in opposition to that party.

I’m going to take another wild guess and assume this party was not thought — even by the liberal election officials — to be the Republican Party.

What’s funny is that I seem to remember another party officially opposed to God. It was once dominant in places such as the Soviet Union, Hungary and Albania and still masquerades as its old self in China. I don’t think it started with “D,” though, but was one letter back.

So should the Democrats henceforth be known as the Demonrats? Will their new symbol be the Pentagram? Will they trade the donkey for the Tasmanian devil? Will their (relatively few) election winners be sworn in this coming January on a book written by Anton LaVey?

This also explains why the Democrats’ campaign tactics seem to perfectly align with occultist Aleister Crowley’s maxim “Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law.” It also should shape Republican campaign tactics in future elections. Forget spending millions of dollars on ads, political strategists, data mining and get-out-the-vote efforts. All they really need do is hire an army of exorcists.

Contact Selwyn Duke, follow him on Twitter or log on to • (1003 views)

This entry was posted in Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to It’s Official: The Democrats are the Party of the Devil

  1. James Smith says:

    I just call them DEMONICRATS ! ! !

  2. Timothy Lane says:

    Well, there’s a reason I refer to their leaders as Barry Screwtape Obama and Harry Wormwood Reid. But note that, just as “God bless you” is now considered a politically charged term, so are Independence Day parades. Thus, not only is godlessness associated with Democrats, but patriotism with Republicans — and this is how ordinary people are assumed to react.

  3. David Ray says:

    Ann Coulter cited in one of her books how the DNC hired some “advisor” (I can’t remember her name) to teach them how to fake sounding religious. One expression candidates were encouraged to employ was “God’s green earth”.

    There’s reason why Howard Dean erroneously placed the Book of Job in the New Testament after, amusingly, stating “If you know much about the Bible, which I do . . . ”

    Dean also said concerning the Republicans: ” . . . it’s a monolithic party . . . It’s pretty much a white Christian party”
    And for the Democrats, the reciprocal of that would be? . . .

    • Timothy Lane says:

      Erring about the Bible is hardly nothing new for Democrats. Note that Jesse Jackson referred to Dan Quayle as the King Herod of the Republicans (even though it’s Jackson who decided to support the Massacre of the Innocents out of political expediency) and referred to Joseph and Mary as “homeless” (which is supported by none of the Gospels). You may also recall the 2008 slogan (by people who claim to eschew slogans), “Jesus was a community organizer, Pontius Pilate was a governor.”

  4. Timothy Lane says:

    As it happens, this incident is also briefly mentioned in The Week, where it notes that “county officials” made the decision. It occurred to me that this greatly resembles a similar occurrence nearly 20 years ago, when the NAACP and other liberals responded to the new GOP Congress by attacking tax cuts, welfare “cuts”, and more severe punishments for criminals as racist. Just as the election officials, by declaring that “God bless you” constitutes electioneering, strongly implied that one party was devoutly atheistic, so the earlier liberals by not merely opposing such policies but declaring them racist strongly implied that blacks were welfare recipients rather than taxpayers, and that blacks were criminals rather than crime victims. In other words, they chose to confirm every anti-black stereotype.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *