What Do You Get When You Elect a Democrat?

BrokenDonkeyby Jerry Richardson   8/24/14
It’s time we Conservatives stopped mincing words when we criticize Democrat politicians. What exactly do the America people get when they elect a Democrat?

Let me emphasize two very important caveats in this discussion: I am NOT talking about all Democrats; I am talking specifically about Democrat politicians; furthermore, I am talking about present-day Democrats, now better termed Progressives.  There have been Democrat politicians in the past that do not fit the description that I present in this article; unfortunately we don’t see their type anymore.  We don’t see Harry “the buck stops here” Truman types.  Instead we see Barack “pass the buck” Obama types.

Please notice that I will steadfastly refuse to use the term “Democratic” either for the party or for its politicians.  I, along with our nation’s founding fathers, have a deep, and I believe, justified repulsion for governmental democracy.  That is an important topic, but not one I intend to delve into in this article.

Our government is a REPUBLIC, not a democracy; A REPUBLIC not a democracy; A REPUBLIC not a democracy.

Nevertheless, I think it is a misuse of the term “Democratic” to apply it to the modern Progressive, aka Democrat party—socialistic or communistic are more apropos terms for the perpetual tax-and-spend-spend-spend party.

So, what do you get when you elect a Democrat?

First and most important to know, understand, and remember is that when you elect a Democrat you get, by necessity, a talking-point-fabricator (referred to as a liar in some circles).

Why is this so?

Democrat policies, when truthfully presented, are not popular with the majority of the American people.

Why?

Democrat policies ALWAYS involve tax-and-spend which mostly ends-up being nothing but poorly disguised wealth redistribution.  It means taking from the productive and giving it to the unproductive.  It means taking from those who have earned and giving to those who have not earned. This is not a popular notion with the majority of the American people.  Currently, wealth redistribution is popular with approximately 40 percent of the American people.

How do I know this?

The recent polls on Obama’s personal popularity have been consistently bottoming-out at around 40 percent, give or take a few percentage points.  In other words, currently about 40 percent of the American people want, and will vote for, the hand-outs that Obama and the Democrats promise.

So, it is necessary for Democrat politicians to be dishonest about the policies that they propose and support because otherwise those policies would not be enacted.

The best example is Obamacare.

The American people, after they were forced down Nancy Pelosi’s politically-warped rabbit-hole—“We have to pass the bill so we can find out what is in it”—have overwhelming rejected Obamacare.  If the American people had been honestly informed, before the bill was shoved down their collective throats, there would have been enough uproar that Obamacare would most likely not have been passed.

So, Obama and the Democrat politicians had to lie.  They always have to lie. They always have to cover their real intentions, because what they really support is not what the majority of the American people want. This is why Obama is intent on “fundamentally transforming the United States of America”; so that Democrat/Progressives can become an honest party, instead of being the party of the lie.

What else do you get when you elect a Democrat?

You get a demagogue (“A political leader who seeks support by appealing to popular passions and prejudices.”).  With Democrats, in the words of Rahm Emmanuel, “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste.” So, every issue must be politicized in an attempt to arouse passions and prejudice in favor of the Democrat position, however harmful it may be to the Nation.  Statesmanship; whatever is that?  The last sorta-kinda-wannabe statesman that the Democrat party had was Joe Lieberman, and the establishment Democrats abandoned him in the primary and he had to run as an Independent to be reelected.

What else do you get when you elect a Democrat?

You get a supporter of black racism.  It has become SOP (Standard Operating Procedure) for Democrat politicians to “play the race card.”

Why is that?

A large part of the Democrat voting base is the black, governmental hand-out group—yes there are others in the hand-out group.   Democrats will do virtually anything, other than tell the truth, to avoid alienating this overwhelmingly Democrat voting block—about 97 percent of the black vote went to Obama.

A typical example of Democrat support for black racism just occurred recently in Missouri; a disgusting “rush to judgment” by Missouri governor Jay Nixon in support of demands from the black, Ferguson lynch-mob:

“Not content with a regular prosecution or a vigorous investigation, Missouri Gov. Jay Nixon [a Democrat] said he hopes that Ferguson, Mo., police officer Darren Wilson will receive a “vigorous prosecution” in the shooting death of Michael Brown on Aug. 9.”  —Democrat Governor Nixon

What else do you get when you elect a Democrat?

You get soft-on-crime combined with opposition to the private citizen’s right to self-defense: Opposition to the Constitutional guarantee of the right “to keep and bear arms.”

Why is that?

Democrats, and those who support big-statism-government, want a disarmed civilian population, just like King George III of England wanted the American Colonies to be disarmed; and for good reason: An armed population is always a potential threat to totalitarian ambitions.

Sure, but why soft-on-crime?

Duh, criminals are reliable supporters of Democrat policies; with Democrats in charge, criminals don’t even have to steal, the government does it for them.

What else do you get when you elect a Democrat?

You get a politician who interprets the 1st Amendment to guarantee freedom from religion rather than freedom of religion.  The current religion of most Progressives is the combined faith of Progressivism and Environmentalism, and Progressive’s support for their religion is their determination to make it a state-mandated religion.

What else do you get when you elect a Democrat?

You get someone who piously lectures everyone, for political reasons, about collateral-damage (damage to non-combatants) in a war with blood-thirsty terrorists such as Hamas; and in the same person, you get someone who has no concern for the 50 million innocent babies who have been collateral-damage in the right-to-choose war.

What else do you get when you elect a Democrat?

You get someone who gives publicized lip-service to the American military, but who has no comprehension of military-methods, and secretly despises all things military.  You get someone whose basic foreign-policy stance will always be a pretend-it-is-peace form of appeasement e.g., in the mode of Neville Chamberlain.  You get someone who will assist America’s enemies and betray America’s friends.

What do you get when you elect a Democrat?

You get Obama.

© 2014, Jerry Richardson • (887 views)

Share
This entry was posted in Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to What Do You Get When You Elect a Democrat?

  1. Timothy Lane says:

    An excellent summation of the modern Democratic Party. I do have a few additional observations. First, one must remember that the Donkey ticket has always planed party above country. There’s a reason that most wars were started by Democrats; they could count on Republican support in a way that Republicans could never count on Democratic support (as could be seen by how many Democrats switched quickly from hawk to dove after the 1968 election).

    As for the dishonesty of Democrats, I’ve noticed for some time that every Democrat nominated for President since the 1980s (and all the Veeps except Lieberman) was a pathological liar. Clearly, the results of the 1980-8 elections, in which 3 men who were no more dishonest than is expected of professional politicians persuaded the Democrat voters that they needed a maximum of lying to win an election.

    As for being soft on crime, I suspect that there are 2 primary reasons. For one thing, one must remember that liberalism comes from the 1960s counter-culture, and thus is heavily opposed to authority figures such as policemen (even as they seek to maximize their power). An excellent example of the reflexive good/bad group identifications for liberals can be seen in the movie Starman.

    As for the liberal religion, this matches my suggestion that their deity is the bastard child of Gaia and Moloch (with an emphasis on the latter).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *