Forums

Welcome Guest 

Show/Hide Header

Welcome Guest, posting in this forum requires registration.





Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Smartphone Separation Anxiety
Brad-
Nelson
Administrator
Posts: 355
Permalink
Brad Nelson
Post Smartphone Separation Anxiety
on: August 16, 2017, 09:19
Quote

Okay, I’m the first to admit that I like posting my thoughts, opinions, etc., online. It’s fun. It’s a way to express yourself. And using fancy, schmancy words, it’s a way to “connect” with people. (One often needs to disconnect a time or two as well.)

And I pay for the privilege. I just charged the credit card $109.00 for yearly renewal of this site. But this isn’t a plea for contributions (but don’t let that stop you). I just thought full disclosure was needed before talking about “smartphone separation anxiety” as noted in this article: Smartphone separation anxiety is growing problem, says scientist

Note the “says scientists.” Well, they’re never wrong. And surely there must be some particle accelerator somewhere that has confirmed this anxiety beyond all doubt. Or you just type in a new name and instead of “Climate Models” you can get all those CPU cycles and algorithms working on “Smartphone Separation Anxiety.” Jiggle the numbers and you can come up with any answer you want.

But given that in some countries they have tried padding the utility poles on the streets so that phone zombies don’t hurt themselves by walking into them, we can take the idea of “smartphone separation anxiety” as a prima facie case.

But first, a good laugh. If you are living a significant portion of your life through Tweets and small nothings, you have a lot more to worry about than SSA. But technology is cool. There are all kinds of cool apps. And, honest to god, I still really don’t know what is so damn interesting on those phones that would make people walk into an intersection without looking up. And I’m assuming that not all of the time they are looking at porn.

What we really need is a government program to study this, and perhaps to regulate. One dimwit at National Review suggested, for instance, that to vanquish issues of free speech violations, Google, Facebook, etc., should be treated like utilities and regulated by the government.

One commentator got in a witty point:

"While I understand and share the concern about allowing government interference in private businesses, even those with monopoly power, we should not allow the conservative ship to be wrecked on the shoals of philosophical abstraction."

It's not a philosophical abstration, kids; it's a principle of governance - keep it limited. You sound like Boromir - "I'll use the One Ring for good, I promise!" Completely ignoring the reason why we keep government limited in the first place. And why the Ring has to be chucked into the Fires of Mount Doom.

Sorry, but I disagree. Emphatically. We can fight the good fight by using platforms that are intentionally and strongly supportive of free speech. Minds.com, vid.me, among many, many others.

Anyway, not that there are not abuses that might actually violate some good and reasonable law that already exists. But I say, if you don’t like Facebook or Google, use something else. Build something else. I’m now using (as much as I can) DuckDuckGo.com for searches because of that latest Google outrage.

But I digress. I think. Maybe I’ve developed Internet Stupidity Anxiety. Goodness gracious, there’s a lot of it out there. And it’s now connected at light speed. And there are many many specialized apps for stupid.

Anyway, back to the subject at hand. Here’s the money quote from the article:

“When users perceive smartphones as their extended selves, they are more likely to become attached to the devices, which, in turn, leads to nomophobia by heightening the phone proximity-seeking tendency,” he added.

I thought nomophobia was fear of disney animated movies about fish. But I get it about the “extended self” thing. I think the internet (and smartphones) obviously facilitate this. And whether trying to connect to God or to #share-separation-anxiety, the desire to connect with something larger than oneself is innate. I suppose connecting to God rather than Google is a nobler cause. But the more immediate and easier method is Google.

And this God of connection is immediate. We’re told that the trinitarian God loves us. But much more powerful are the various gods of social media where you can be “Liked.” God can love you only once. But you can be “Liked” hundreds of times.

Am I sneering at all this? Of course I am. If you have “smartphone separation anxiety” you are an idiot, plain and simple. Am I supposed to be more charitable toward the kinds of people who are causing civic alarm because they are regularly, and in fairly large numbers, hurting themselves because they are walking around like zombies paying attention to their phones and not traffic?

I end this by re-posting one of the comments to this article which makes some fair points:

Anyone who permits her/himself to become "dependent" on any electronic toy has a more serious underlying issue: the complete lack of a "life of the mind." (That, not necessarily their "fault," see below).

Substituting the reductive and often grossly skewed (but so "easy to access") "Answers" findable on a "smart"phone (or on the web overall—in place of research, in-depth reading, analysis, research and THINKING —produces humans who ARE addicted, jibbering idiots (also very easy to manipulate). "Smart"phones also substitute shallow fake-babble for emotional intimacy.

Sadly and by and large, our so-called "educational systems" continue to "train" grammar and high school students to become docile, obedient 19th century factory workers — at the same time that all this shallow techno-candy garbage SEEMS to be so "hip and relevant."

Today, entire generations of young people have never been exposed to actual education (i.e. training the mind to explore the world and know itself), and thus fall for the only available substitute ~ shallow and often fake information often provided by others equally ignorant or worse, pushing a self-serving point of view, all conveyed by the sharks of New (tech) capitalism, eager to extract maximum cash from the exceedingly unwary (and, being uneducated, highly gullible).

Ah modern times. Ain't they great!

Timothy-
Lane
Moderator
Posts: 164
Permalink
Post Re: Smartphone Separation Anxiety
on: August 16, 2017, 11:24
Quote

I can remember being addicted to TV when I was young, and as I grew up I sought to avoid anything like that. I certainly spend a lot of time on my laptop now, but then it.s my news source (it's virtually impossible getting a newspaper delivered to a hotel) and my music player as well as my inernet communicator. And I still read books and magazines as well as doing puzzles.

Brad-
Nelson
Administrator
Posts: 355
Permalink
Brad Nelson
Post Re: Smartphone Separation Anxiety
on: August 16, 2017, 12:03
Quote

My issues isn’t addiction. It’s more along the lines of “A mind is a terrible thing to waste.”

Still, I admit I know really know what the average person is doing, what they find so fascinating that they would rather look at their phone screen than oncoming traffic.

If they announced that a large comet was heading right toward earth and would hit in an hour, with accompanying video of the comet, I can understand that. If they announced that aliens (not illegal aliens) just landed in DC, live video stream, I can understand putting an oncoming locomotive out of my attention, if only for an instant.

But I honestly don’t know what people find so damn fascinating inside their phones. What seems obvious as a result is the trivialization of the mind which is the most complex and amazing creation that we know of besides the universe as a whole.

pst4usa
Contributor
Posts: 45
Permalink
Post Re: Smartphone Separation Anxiety
on: August 17, 2017, 15:30
Quote

Brad, I think you give some of these yutes too much credit. Some of them are just trying to look and feel important. I mean really, if I am engrossed in something that immediate and that important, well, I must be important, Right?

Kung Fu Zu
Moderator
Posts: 86
Permalink
Kung Fu Zu
Post Re: Smartphone Separation Anxiety
on: August 17, 2017, 16:21
Quote

On my recent trip to Taiwan, I saw a first. (For me at least.)

While waiting for green at a stoplight, I saw a girl riding on the back seat of a scooter texting with her smart phone as her, I assume, boyfriend was driving up to the stoplight. She was using both hands to text. Clearly, Americans are not the only loons in this world where smart phones are concerned.

Timothy-
Lane
Moderator
Posts: 164
Permalink
Post Re: Smartphone Separation Anxiety
on: August 17, 2017, 18:05
Quote

Well, at least she wasn't driving and texting. But I hope she was very firmly attached.

Brad-
Nelson
Administrator
Posts: 355
Permalink
Brad Nelson
Post Re: Smartphone Separation Anxiety
on: August 18, 2017, 09:55
Quote

Brad, I think you give some of these yutes too much credit. Some of them are just trying to look and feel important.

Conspicuous consumption, Pat? That is my younger brother’s take on a lot of cell phone use in supermarkets and such when people were calling their wives to ask about which brand of celery to buy. And a lot of people seemed to be showing off in the checkout line, carrying on conversations that sounded oh so important.

I think that answer fit a lot of people early-on. But now cell phone use is so obnoxiously prominent that I think it reflects something deeper going on. City Man, in particular, has become very uncomfortable just being with himself. Fill in the blanks why this is so.

Brad-
Nelson
Administrator
Posts: 355
Permalink
Brad Nelson
Post Re: Smartphone Separation Anxiety
on: August 18, 2017, 09:57
Quote

Clearly, Americans are not the only loons in this world where smart phones are concerned.

Mr. Kung, one might suppose she was texting the driver.

Kung Fu Zu
Moderator
Posts: 86
Permalink
Kung Fu Zu
Post Re: Smartphone Separation Anxiety
on: August 18, 2017, 11:52
Quote

one might suppose she was texting the driver.

That was my belly-laugh for the day.

Pages: [1]
Mingle Forum by cartpauj
Version: 1.0.34 ; Page loaded in: 0.619 seconds.