The Foggy Message of HIV Awareness Day

AIDSthumbby Linda Harvey
Once again this year (2013),the federal government agency that tracks disease in our country held an annual National Gay Men’s HIV/AIDS Awareness Day to raise awareness about the HIV epidemic among men who have sex with men (MSM) in the United States.

I am just going to quote portions of the press release that came out from the CDC, the Centers for Disease Control, about their reason for this day:

“Gay and bisexual men of all races and ethnicities are still at the center of the HIV epidemic in the United States. Just 2% of the U.S. population, they accounted for 63% of all new HIV infections in 2010 and 52% of people living with HIV infection in the United States in 2009. From 2008 to 2010, the estimated number of new HIV infections rose 12% among MSM [males who have sex with males] overall and 22% among young MSM (aged 13 to 24 years); black MSM accounted for more than half of infections among young MSM in 2010. In fact, young black MSM [males who have sex with males] now account for more new infections than any other subgroup by race/ethnicity, age, or sex.

I’m still quoting here:

“CDC wants to reduce these numbers. We are working hand-in-hand with our many partners in communities across the country, and at the state and the national levels. …In 2012, CDC tailored funding for prevention efforts by providing $55 million over 5 years (2012 through 2017) to support community-led HIV prevention for young gay and bisexual men and transgender people of color….

“Basic prevention tools are still and will always be the first step and most effective if used. For sexually active gay and bisexual men who are HIV-negative, that means getting tested for HIV and sexually transmitted infections at least once a year and using condoms correctly and consistently. For sexually active gay and bisexual men who are living with HIV, that means using condoms correctly and consistently and being on effective antiretroviral therapy to stay healthy and reduce the risk of spreading HIV to partners.”

[pullquote]This same agency, the CDC, did not fight lung cancer with filtered cigarettes. They said, “Don’t smoke.” They mandated “Surgeon General’s Warnings” on cigarette packages and still do. Where are the warnings on “gay” bathhouses?[/pullquote] Okay, so let’s review. How is our federal disease-tracking agency combatting homosexually-caused HIV in this country, which accounts for about two thirds of all the HIV cases? Did you hear any mention in here at all of refraining from the behaviors that result in this disease? Or even more insightful, no one is born homosexual and you don’t have to be involved in any of this? No, they are saying, use condoms and keep getting tested. Yes, it’s a serious disease. But no, we at the CDC aren’t going to pass judgment on any sexual activity out there, except just to help you manage it better, no matter what it costs you or other Americans.

This same agency, the CDC, did not fight lung cancer with filtered cigarettes. They said, “Don’t smoke.” They mandated “Surgeon General’s Warnings” on cigarette packages and still do. Where are the warnings on “gay” bathhouses? They don’t exist. What the “gay” men who frequent those establishments will sometimes encounter are paid staff members from local AIDS non-profits, handing out condoms. This is called “outreach” and serves to satisfy some reports to the feds about the “effectiveness” of the use of taxpayer funds.

Is America on a good path here? The state of science and health in this country sure seems to be moving away from objectivity and instead, is heavily influenced by special interest groups. The “gay” lobby has inappropriate input into policy at the CDC/HIV-AIDS division, making sure they keep a “sex-positive” attitude and keeping the local non-profit AIDS groups in cash while deflecting any real progress toward epidemic control. Isn’t this what self-destructive cultures do? They race toward a cliff and call it by any name except what it is. Today, it’s often called “progress.”

If nothing else, our CDC ought to be willing to convey a consistent and unchanging abstinence message to teen boys. And they ought to be willing to share the widespread knowledge that leaving homosexuality is absolutely possible. Thousands have done it.

Yet another hallmark of an imploding culture is how recklessly the young are treated. At least, friends, if you are aware, you can educate others. Urge the health care professionals you know to keep upholding the truth, and insisting on its application, for the benefit of all Americans.
__________________________________________________
MissionAmericaThumbLinda Harvey is president of Mission America and hosts a talk show on Salem affiliate WRFD in Columbus, OH. • (1417 views)

Share
This entry was posted in Politics and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to The Foggy Message of HIV Awareness Day

  1. Kung Fu Zu says:

    From about 1500 to about 1900 if one contracted syphilis it was also pretty much a death sentence, especially in the earlier part of this period. Another common outcome was insanity or general dementia.

    Like today, people knew it was sexually transmitted and knew the best way to avoid it was to avoid promiscuity, which the homosexual community is famous for.

    In the late 1980’s/early 1990’s, I recall some in the HIV medical community predicting that HIV would spread in the heterosexual community much as it had in the homosexual community. By the mid 1990’s they had to admit that it had not done so. Basically, they came to the conclusion that it did not because heterosexuals were more monogamous than homosexuals.

    There was a BBC radio program which dealt with this. I will never forget hearing one of the researchers interviewed say that it appeared that promiscuous heterosexuals pretty much slept around with each other and not in the general pool of monogamous heterosexuals. Thus HIV/AIDS never took hold in the heterosexual community. The original thought was that bisexual men would introduce HIV/AIDS into the heterosexual community and off it would go.

    This same program broke down the chances of various groups of contracting HIV.
    They specifically mentioned, men contracted it more than women, homosexual men had a greater chance of contracting HIV than heterosexual men, blacks more than whites and intravenous drug users more than none drug users. The clear implication was that if you were a black homosexual drug user, you were here on borrowed time. And I just checked to see what the present situation is as to which groups have the highest incidence of HIV/AIDS and it hasn’t much changed.

    When I was a child we called such diseases “social diseases”. Now the euphemism has gone farther and they are know as STD’s. It’s almost as if we believe they will disappear if we make the sound innocuous.

    Finally, never underestimate the money incentive here. There have been billions spent on tests, treatment and research for a disease which does not effect or kill nearly as many people as influenza or pneumonia. I did a quick check and as of 2010, something like 300-350,000 people had died in the U.S. from AIDS since it was first recognized in the 1980’s. That’s something like 11-12,000 per year. Over 50,000 die per year from prostate cancer. Many more die from heart disease and other cancers. But the thing about HIV/AIDS is that in order to get it under control, we would have to pressure a special interest group with huge influence in the arts and media to admit and change their behavior. They, like too many others, don’t like being judged, regardless of the soundness of the judgement.

  2. Timothy Lane says:

    It’s easy to figure out why the CDC hasn’t brought up the matter of homosexual behavior. This would be politically very incorrect, and that has mattered more to them than science at least since they proclaimed, during the Clinton era, that violence was in effect a disease caused by bullets — by which logic, Jack the Ripper and Ted Bundy weren’t violent killers since they didn’t use guns. (Even pistol-whipping would be non-violent if there were no bullets in the gun.) I’ve never trusted them since then.

  3. cdjaco says:

    In my opinion, any “awareness” event or movement is a joke if the issue they’re trying to spread “awareness” about has already been covered by a multitude of news stories, TV show episodes and at least one big-screen movie featuring an A-list star.

    Seriously, who ISN’T aware of HIV/AIDS and how it’s contracted at this point?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *