Down Under not so down?

by Brad Nelson   2/10/14

Apparently, conservative leadership is still possible. Samuel Gregg has an article (Finally, a Conservative Leader) at The American Spectator about the supposedly conservative (I’m always skeptical) Tony Abbot, Australia’s new Prime Minister. By the description in the article, he seems to be the real deal. He’s not a global warming true believer, for instance. And he’s not apparently for big bail-outs.

Here’s a good quote from the article:

Abbott has also long understood that conservative governments can’t treat cultural issues as the orphans of their policy agenda. He’s never hidden his belief that Western civilization is generally a very good thing — particularly its Anglosphere component. Nor have Abbott’s views on social issues ever won him applause from the left. On these and other subjects, Abbott has stressed he’s never been impressed by the “inevitability” argument that’s invariably trotted out by progressivists as they try to stream-roll their preferred objectives. That suggests Abbott isn’t likely to fall for the trap which John Stuart Mill proposed as the best way to transform conservatives into liberals: i.e., you convince conservatives that a liberal position is actually a conservative view.

One feels quite sure that if National Review has an Australian office, they were backing this man’s liberal opponent.
Have a blog post you want to share? Click here. • (1531 views)

Brad Nelson

About Brad Nelson

I like books, nature, politics, old movies, Ronald Reagan (you get sort of a three-fer with that one), and the founding ideals of this country. We are the Shining City on the Hill — or ought to be. However, our land has been poisoned by Utopian aspirations and feel-good bromides. Both have replaced wisdom and facts.
This entry was posted in Blog Post and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Down Under not so down?

  1. Timothy Lane says:

    Well, I know I’ve read articles praising Abbott’s stance (particularly right after he was elected), but I don’t remember where. It might have been in National Review or NRO.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *