Contact

General info: info@stubbornthings.org
Submissions: submissions@stubbornthings.org
Moderation/Registration issues: info@stubbornthings.org

Content
Our goal is to facilitate sharing the thoughts and experiences of average (or above average) Americans who have something to say through a general conservative/traditional-American lens. If you are a budding writer, we will provide assistance or advice to bring your article up to publishing standards if you so desire and if we see a subject matter of interest, otherwise all submissions will be either accepted or rejected as-is. Articles can be anywhere from about 500 to 1000 words. Include your name, email address, and your suggested title for the article. We will change the title and/or provide a brief summary of the article at our editorial discretion.

Formatting
All text should be single-spaced. Align all text left (no indents) and add an extra return between paragraphs. Microsoft Word or rtf documents are best. Less is more, so take it easy on bold or italic type and avoid all-caps. You may use hyperlinks but please keep them to a minimum. Put block quotations in boldface.

Graphics
Attach to your email any absolutely necessary and relevant graphics or photos in jpg, gif, or png format. We will use them as space and time allow. No copyrighted material please.

Bring in the Lawyers
All material remains the property of the submitting authors.

Credit (optional)
Include the information (if any) that you would like to appear below the article as an “author’s credit” including your email, link to your website or blog, and any brief relevant information (such as your general area of expertise).

Hifalutin is Definitely Optional
At “StubbornThings” you would suppose that we want facts, facts, and more facts — statistics up the ying-yang. But in our opinion, although facts are often necessary to make a good argument, the state of Western Civilization isn’t decaying because of a lack of facts and statistics. It is usually because of a lack of good ideas and principles and the proliferation of bad ideas and principles. Please therefore keep in mind that although we appreciate erudite and fact-filled articles, we are just as tickled-pink by opinions from real Americans (or lovers of liberty, wherever they are) who might not obsess over such things as what the meaning of the word “is” is. Such intellectualism (Thomas Sowell is our guide in this regard) often obscures more than it enlightens. So please don’t be shy if you speak and write like a real person instead of one of the typical talking-head clones that you see on TV news shows.

2 Responses to Contact

  1. A. Wild says:

    Hello Mr. Fairman.

    I just read your short article on “Science: A Graven Image”. While I agree with your premises, it is unfortunate you compared it the case of Galileo.

    Your premises regarding Galileo are indeed part of the popular myth. Galileo was not a cleric, he was a layman with children. Secondly, the Church did not condemn Galileo for the heliocentric theory which was known long before Galileo. After all, it was the Church who provided room and board in his old age when under “house arrest”. Rather, the Church found Galileo guilty of making a claim that had as yet not been sufficiently proven in reality. The theory was not the issue. Making hitherto claims not yet verified was the concern. It should also be remembered, Galileo had a knack for alienating his most ardent admirers such as the pope at the time.

    • Brad Nelson Brad Nelson says:

      A. Wild is referring to this article at American Thinker (an article that Glenn has posted as a post in his latest article here). I’ll cut-and-past Mr. (or Mrs.) Wild’s comments into Glenn’s article and the delete them here.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *