The “Closed Circle” of the Arab

ArabThumbby Glenn Fairman  11/1/13
Viewed through the prism of the West, which draws its sustenance from the twin fountains of Athens and Jerusalem, the character and plight of Arab existence has been viewed both as romantic, tragic, and uniquely foreign to our sensibilities. The fact that its spirit is wholly antithetical to ours has been a point of contention between those advocates of multiculturalism and those jealous of the West’s rich patrimony.

That the Arabs are a civilization which is deeply stratified along family, clan and tribe is a fundamental observation. If, however, one overlays the Arab’s psychological predisposition to the “power/challenge,” money-favoring, careerist, and “shame/honor” dynamics of culture, we in the West cannot hope for any genuine alliances that are based upon anything more solid than contingencies of transitory mutual advantage. Moreover, the Liberal West must come finally to the stark realization that The Arab world is a zone where democracy and human rights, as we view them, cannot flourish because such a Western abstraction cannot set its tendrils down in the flinty earth of unenlightened self interest. In the realm of the Middle East, politics and prestige are as they have always been– the currency of a zero-sum game.[pullquote]Without understanding the dynamic of the Arabic “power/challenge” struggle, their entire culture appears to the West to be one of madness instead of intense and never ending calculation for superiority and honor at the expense of anything that even approaches what the West views as political stability, human rights, and moral virtue.[/pullquote]

In the late 1980’s, David Pryce-Jones authored a book entitled The Closed Circle, in which he interpreted the psychic rudiments of the Arab weltanschauung; and unless one understands this mentality on its own terms, the Occidental mind will never gain traction either in negotiations or in bridging the gulf between civilizations– to the West’s own peril. Although it was written several decades ago, no other book has ever offered a convincing understanding of their rationale in decision making and conduct. Without understanding the dynamic of the Arabic “power/challenge” struggle, their entire culture appears to the West to be one of madness instead of intense and never ending calculation for superiority and honor at the expense of anything that even approaches what the West views as political stability, human rights, and moral virtue.

In the light of such cultural dynamics, we err gravely when we rely upon projecting the suppositions of Western values into the cauldron of the Middle East. As a case in point, the Western powers have naively sought to reduce the Palestinian question to one of real estate and the contractual exigency of a settlement where give and take is an implicit axiom. However, undergirding the prospects of such an agreement are the complications of the Shame/Honor dialectic and the Islamic tenet that once a land has been claimed for Allah, it belongs in perpetuity to the faith. Therein, the struggle between Arab and Jew is fraught with the contagion of shame and the resulting loss of honor at having been bested by the loathsome Jew. If one throws into the mix the military humiliations of the last century at the hands of Israel and the Western Powers, it becomes readily apparent that the Arab Psyche that glorifies domination and revenge can not countenance such a transaction, especially now that the Star of Islam is ascending on the world’s stage.

The Arab World and its Islamic worldview have proven inconsistent with the tenets of modernity and free intellectual exchange because of its inability to both wield and relinquish power and to brook dissent. Since the fall of the Ottoman Empire at the close of WWI and the creation of the Middle Eastern nations out of whole cloth, the orderly transfer of power in Arab States is practically a null set. Instead, we see the ancient motifs of “power challenging” occurring again and again—actuated through conspiracy and temporary coalitions that are usually stratified along tribal loyalties. No sooner, however, as one dog reaches the top of the heap, a new round of murmuring arises through those participants who feel that they are being shortchanged or disrespected through the money favoring nexus—proving true the old adage quoted in a recent column that “an Arab cannot be bought, only rented.”

Without institutional mores set in place in which power devolves peacefully and without rancor, ruthless violence has been the only means by which power is maintained or usurped. Despite the window dressing of political rhetoric that promises freedom and change following the downfall of a corrupt regime, no amount of ideological overlay ever changes the deep set cultural barbarism in which only the names change at the top while the losers are purged and the weak brutally fleeced.[pullquote]By ignoring the “shame-honor” duality, we fail to grasp the subterranean darkness that motivates the Honor Killings of daughters or apostates who “blacken the face” of the Arab family. In this perverse milieu, the shedding of “guilty” blood is the only manner in which a face can again “be whitened.”[/pullquote]

For the suffering millions who have endured life under Islamic theocracy or Pan-Arabic Socialism, the song has ever remained the same. The West, and in particular the American administrations of the past century, have been played like proverbial fiddles because in failing to understand the Arab consciousness and its animating interests, they believe, like all good liberals believe, that all cultures and moralities are commensurate and therein rational and receptive to calculations of long term expedience. By not heeding the “Power/Challenge dialectic,” we fail to understand what motivates the manifest treachery and butchery in the Middle Eastern arc—either from paranoid dictators or in the rising host of new tyrannical carnivores that wait in the wings in hopes of one day being given the opportunity to strike and therein wield the reins of unmixed power.

By ignoring the “shame-honor” duality, we fail to grasp the subterranean darkness that motivates the Honor Killings of daughters or apostates who “blacken the face” of the Arab family. In this perverse milieu, the shedding of “guilty” blood is the only manner in which a face can again “be whitened.” As a tribute to the cultural gulf that separates our sensibilities, it is incomprehensible to us that this barbaric filial vengeance is not only deemed justice but indeed morally laudable in the twisted logic of the Arab’s exaggerated sense of pride.

The great schizophrenia of the Arab mind must wrestle with two mutually exclusive thoughts: that they are the most blessed of the earth while in fact being the most wretched. Unable to reconcile these twin polarities and in turn incapable of the self-reflection necessary for a civilization’s enlightened Reformation to occur, a host of scapegoats are necessary in the form of Jews, infidels, and Imperialists who are persistently denying the chosen people their proper station. Until this transformation occurs, the remedy for the Arab soul will be “more Islam” and an unending return to filial bloodshed, intrigue, and unrelenting tyranny both between man and woman or regime and subject. Having proved the biblical adage that “the dog returns to its own vomit,” the Closed Circle of the Arab heart retains a sickness that is never cured and a lesson that is forever unlearned.
__________________________________________________
Glenn Fairman writes from Highland, Ca. He can be reached at arete5000@dslextreme.com. • (947 views)

Share
Glenn Fairman

About Glenn Fairman

retired
This entry was posted in Politics and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to The “Closed Circle” of the Arab

  1. Brad Nelson Brad Nelson says:

    That’s an outstanding article, Glenn. You really have a grasp of the Arab mindset, and I would say the mindset of Islam itself. Excellent.

  2. Timothy Lane says:

    The Closed Circle is one of the many books I have on the subject. My own view is that Islam was crafted by Mohammed for the Arabs of his era, who were primarily desert raiders. If they were capable of modernizing it they might have something worthy of belief, but their incuriousity toward everything other than Islam and Arab culture makes that unlikely.

    The article also reminds me of the “consequentialism” that Arthur Koestler discussed in the anti-communist novel Darkness at Noon. The logical basis for their claim that Rubashov had betrayed the unnamed leader was that he had disagreed with him, which meant that loyalty to the Cause required him to get rid of the leader in order to impose his own will. The specific accusations were merely the acts he would have committed if he had taken such a disagreement to its logical conclusion. It ultimately requires an extreme arrogance at its heart.

  3. Tatersalad says:

    ……….and while everyone is having festivities and song this is going on behind out backs:

    The Obama administration is now having their usual secret meetings with convicted Muslim terrorists on Capitol Hill: –

    http://www.investigativeproject.org/4234/ipt-exclusive-al-arian-resurfaces-in-new-american

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *