Bully! for the Bossy

by Brad Nelson2/27/19

Kira Davis has an article at Townhall.com that is instructional: Misbehaving Women: How the Transgender Movement Is Silencing Women

One of the girls who recently lost a race to a boy who was pretending to be a girl said:

I fully support and am happy for these athletes for being true to themselves. They should have the right to express themselves in school

One commenter cuts through the clutter with a “can’t have your cake and eat it too” comment:

Spare us, toots. As long as this girl, and you, are “perfectly fine” letting this preposterous nonsense define who and what you are. Who and what those boys preposterously “identify” as, you are part of the problem and deserve no sympathy. You need to stand astride liberalism and yell “stop”. Your willingness to tolerate it emboldens it. You know how it works:

That’s the issue in a nutshell. Yet another columnist writing “What a crazy world it is!” while never opposing the craziness (and actually being a part of it).

And here’s why I support men-pretending-to-be-women competing in women’s sports. Another commenter writes:

Transgender Movement Is Silencing (Bossy Feministic) Women?
The enemy of my enemy is my friend?

So….if you support the normalizing (or at least “the tolerated”) of the abnormal, how can you ever be against the latest abnormal nonsense that is being pushed as normal (and to be tolerated)? You’ve already conceded the argument to the squeaky wheels who need only squeak.

As for Davis’ notion that once again men are defining women, another commenter shows the vacuousness of this argument:

“They [women] were expected to behave themselves.”

I remember when that statement was true not only of women, but of everybody in this country (including kids). The fact that the democrats didn’t like that expectation is not only what’s been empowering the transgenders (and the entire LGBTQ “community”), but has led us to all kinds of societal division and cultural rot (“Black Lies Matter” and “Antifa” and snowflakes in general).

As a man, I have never had anyone put me down for being a man. LOL

Let alone for being white. LOL

Or for believing that being heterosexual is natural genetics. LOL

Or for being a Christian, for believing right and wrong are not determined by myself or by people who don’t even know what gender they are or should behave as. LOL

It’s so politically fashionable on the left to hate white, male, heterosexual Christians that women don’t have to worry … soon enough, it’ll be illegal to be a white, male, heterosexual Christian.

The problem with the left is that everything they think, do and say is seen from a one sided perspective: “It’s us nuts against everybody else! and other nuts, too!”

Conclusion: It’s not the transgender movement that’s silencing women. That’s just a symptom. The cause is leftist (democrat party) lunacy (mind rot), which is working hard overtime to silence everyone who isn’t a politico/moral nutcase.


Brad is editor and chief disorganizer of StubbornThings.
About Author  Author Archive  Email

Have a blog post you want to share? Click here.

Latest Message: 1 day, 13 hours ago
  • Brad : Just testing this new chat plugin.
  • Brad : More French nonsense. I thought American politics were already broken.
  • Brad : The embedded url did work in that last message.
  • Brad Nelson : [url=https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/02/if-democrats-end-the-filibuster-it-could-break-american-politics/]Link[/url]
  • Brad Nelson : Still just testing to see how well this works.
  • Brad Nelson : David French article
  • Brad Nelson : David French article
  • Brad Nelson : Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country.
  • Brad Nelson : This seems to work okay although I can't get an embedded link to work or use any other regular formatting features.
  • Brad Nelson : This this text bold?
  • Brad Nelson : Testing. Better new at top or bottom?
  • Brad Nelson : I'm hoping Timothy will see this. This seems to be working better than the old Quick Chat plugin. This one is called Simple Ajax Chat.
  • Brad Nelson : Trying another url: Link
  • Brad Nelson : Testing one two.
  • Brad Nelson : A link: https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/02/if-democrats-end-the-filibuster-it-could-break-american-politics/
  • Brad Nelson : I guess if you just paste in a link, this plugin will automatically truncate it. But it won't name the link. So one might say: Go to StubbornThings.org http://www.stubbornthings.org
  • Brad Nelson : Jeeves & Wooster: https://honoriaplum.wordpress.com/2017/01/22/p-g-wodehouse-reading-list-the-jeeves-and-wooster-stories/
  • Brad Nelson : This chat seems to be working fine, so I'm going to keep it for the foreseeable future. Let me know what you think.
  • Brad Nelson : Hello
  • Brad Nelson : Brian C. Joondeph has a refreshingly rational article regarding the fraud of "climate change": https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/03/global_warming_faceplant_on_the_left_coast.html
  • Brad Nelson : Jay Nordlinger has a good tribute to mark the passing of André Previn: https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/03/remembering-andre-previn-composer-conductor-musician/
  • Timothy Lane : The version of the full Nutcracker I have was conducted by Previn, and is so listed among my MP3s. That's what I think of when I see his name.
  • Brad Nelson : Another feature of Previn is that he looks (to me) a bit like The Emperor in Star Wars: https://goo.gl/images/9fi1D1
  • Timothy Lane : Inteeresting. I think you have a point, at least the way the Emperor looked in the sixth movie.
  • Brad Nelson : Although it's arguable that Paul Eddington was a better match for Vader's boss: https://goo.gl/images/BQWEKo
  • Brad Nelson : Ian McDiarmid: https://goo.gl/images/L3xXRA
  • Brad Nelson : This chat box does seem to work. I liked that other one I had (Quick Chat) better because it allowed you (or at least me) to delete specific chats (especially when just testing). But Quick Chat would
  • pst4usa : This is my test of your chat box Brad. Have a good night.
  • pst4usa : By the way Brad, the letter to the editor I sent in was rejected, too long, and too harsh, so I had to rewrite it.
  • Brad Nelson : Hi, Pat. Your letter was terrific. Perhaps we could work it here as an article. Thanks for testing the chat. My previous chat post was cut off. I have since increased the max length to 500 characters. That ought to work even for me!
  • Timothy Lane : I hadn't known there was a character limit. I don't recall ever encountering it, which for me is surprising. I believe you now allow more than Twitter. And one can always continue comments through more than one posting.
  • Brad Nelson : The character limit can be set on the back end. Like most things these days, everything probably starts out hardened against the typical spam that bots spew out.
  • Brad Nelson : Here's a great article by Howard Sachs about socialism equaling eternal childhood: https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/03/a_lesson_for_our_college_kids_about_socialism.html
  • Timothy Lane : It's always nice to see someone catch up to us. I've said for years that leftism infantilizes people, with spoiled brat archetype Veruca Salt as the model for many leftists. But in an article dated today, listing the Boeing 737 as one of the good things capitalism produces may be unwise. The latest I've seen blames the crash on the autopilot, which apparently takes over too quickly and has a problem with takeoffs.
  • Brad Nelson : Yeah...Boing could have some kind of computer glitch going there. Yikes. I think at some point these systems become so complicated, nobody really understand them. I know this is true of computer operating systems which is why changing them can be so difficult.
  • Timothy Lane : This is a point Trump made recently, and that was before they read the black box. As a programmer, I know just how difficult this can be. When you do an operation thousands of times a day, the error rate must be phenomenally low because an error can lead to a serious blow-up. This is even worse with autopilots and self-driving cars than it is with factory automation or dairy cow feeding.
  • Brad Nelson : VDH has a good article that passes your humble Editor’s “not a waste of time to read” filter: Ivy-League Schools Wither: https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/03/elite-universities-ignore-merit-advance-progressive-agenda/
  • Brad Nelson : Yes, Timothy. Finding an error in code can be difficult. These errors can be found and it’s likely that, long-term, a code running an airplane will be safer than even the best pilot. But whether too many martinis-and-stewardesses or undetected bugs, there are risks with both.
  • Timothy Lane : It seems the plane that crashed almost crashed in the same situation the day before. Luckily they had a pilot on hand who knew how to fight the autopilot and win. Next day they didn't.
  • Brad Nelson : Wow. I hadn't heard that. Human tragedy aside, I'd be very interested to find out how such an obvious programming mistake ever got through.
  • Timothy Lane : Mistakes happen, but this does seem odd. Apparently the autopilot takes control after takeoff and then reacts to the fast rise by trying to lower the plane. How on Earth did no one ever notice this?
  • Brad Nelson : That does seem odd. I guess they notice it now. One has to wonder how the actual implementation in planes differs from what had to be a lot of testing in simulators.
  • Brad Nelson : "Luckily they had a pilot on hand who knew how to fight the autopilot and win. " • I just read an article about that. Wow. It's basically on standard checklist: How to regain control of the plane in case the plane has a mind of its own. https://www.foxnews.com/world/lion-air-boeing-737-max-8-was-reportedly-saved-by-off-duty-pilot-day-before-deadly-crash-in-indonesia • One of the planes is said to have recorded days of inaccurate data in regards to airspeed, etc. Wow. This is one major screwu
  • Timothy Lane : Just think: Will self-driving cars work better than Boeing 737 autopilots? At least with the latter, someone can gain control from the bot. And that doesn't even take into account hacking the cars, as has been done as a test.
  • Timothy Lane : There was an appropriate cartoon about the 737 today on Town Hall, neatly comparing it to a camel. The link is: https://townhall.com/political-cartoons/2019/03/21/164230?utm_source=cartoondaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&bcid=b47b353a5f71c0cdd6aa46757e4ae504
  • Brad Nelson : Thanks for the link. I guess that's an appropriate cartoon. I was also thinking, Timothy, that this whole problem with the systems in the plane is like that Star Trek episode where they had trouble disengaging the M-5 multitronic computer in order to regain control of the Enterprise.
  • Timothy Lane : That was the very first episode of Star Trek I ever saw. The fact that it was about a computer interested me. The show quickly became a favorite, of course.
  • Brad Nelson : The guy who plays Dr. Daystrom is great in that episode ("The Ultimate Computer"). My favorite line is when Daystrom is trying to talk-down his computer from going rogue. He appeals to its Snowflake-like self-esteem with the line "You are great. I am great." It shows you that Daystrom was as techie as his computer.
  • Brad Nelson : That is "tetchy." I lovely word more often heard in British programs and such.
  • Timothy Lane : Dr. Daystrom did say he used his own engrams for the computer. Maybe if he'd used a different set it would have worked.
• (37 views)

Share
Brad Nelson

About Brad Nelson

I like books, nature, politics, old movies, Ronald Reagan (you get sort of a three-fer with that one), and the founding ideals of this country. We are the Shining City on the Hill — or ought to be. However, our land has been poisoned by Utopian aspirations and feel-good bromides. Both have replaced wisdom and facts.
This entry was posted in Blog Post. Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to Bully! for the Bossy

  1. Brad Nelson Brad Nelson says:

    In essence, if you play the gender-bending game, it may not always bend your way.

  2. Kung Fu Zu Kung Fu Zu says:

    It would be hilarious if it weren’t so damaging to our culture and society. As it is, it is simply the manifestation of the moral and mental rot which has spread throughout the West.

    • Brad Nelson Brad Nelson says:

      It would be hilarious if it weren’t so damaging to our culture and society. As it is, it is simply the manifestation of the moral and mental rot which has spread throughout the West.

      For once, Mr. Kung — no…make that twice…maybe three times….okay, almost always — I agree with you.

      Still, if you can’t beat them, join them. Believe you me, I’d be standing up, cheering, getting mustard all over my jacket, in sportsman-like (sportsperson-like?) enthusiasm for the men-pretending-to-be-women athletes. You go, girl!

      That one chick writer almost had a point when she said that, once again, men were defining what women could do. But she was just not smart enough to see her own biases. This one is precisely about liberal women deciding what fake men can do (although surely there are some beta-males in the food chain who don’t stand up against this stuff either). Women could put a stop to this in a heartbeat simply by saying “no” and/or refusing to compete against these fake women.

      • Timothy Lane says:

        Beta males indeed. Note that the article mentioned that the various fake women dominating these contests competed until recently as men — with mediocre results. Then they figured out the easiest way to win a trophy was to pretend to be a women and compete against the physically weaker sex.

        • Brad Nelson Brad Nelson says:

          There once was a fleet-footed man
          Who would run just as fast as he can
          But amongst all his peers
          He was far in the rear
          So he altered his first name to Jan

          • Kung Fu Zu Kung Fu Zu says:

            That was good for a belly laugh.

          • Timothy Lane says:

            Excellent, though I think “ran” provides better scansion than “would run”. (I also would use “among” rather than “amongst”, but that’s a matter of word choice, not poetry)

            • Brad Nelson Brad Nelson says:

              Some sacrifices must be made to the English language in order for these things to work out. Get into the spirit of things. Instead of nitpicking mine, do something creative and post it here.

              Timothy the grammatician
              Objects to my exhibition
              To the words and rhymes
              That I am inclined
              Everyone’s such a critician

  3. Timothy Lane says:

    It was an interesting article, but it’s true that Davis’s open objection was to the female victims of transgender competition was to their being silenced. The proper objection — to men claiming to be women competing against actual women — was implicit.

    Incidentally, I wonder what would happen if female gymnasts claimed to be men and then competed against them. Would they take all the awards? Would the men be as mum about it as the women? (Of course they would. Objecting would be even more politically incorrect than it would be for women.)

    • Brad Nelson Brad Nelson says:

      Incidentally, I wonder what would happen if female gymnasts claimed to be men and then competed against them. Would they take all the awards?

      You know, that’s an interesting idea. That is the one area where the events aren’t based upon brute strength. Find me one man who could do what Mary Lou Retton could do on the balance beam, parallel bars, or floor exercise. (On the rings, a woman could indeed not compete.)

      Maybe the inevitable solution is just to have men’s, women’s, and weird0 divisions.

  4. Kung Fu Zu Kung Fu Zu says:

    I read the article and it is truly a stupid one. The first and last paragraphs are the type of nonsense one hears from the left, but I don’t know why anyone with half a brain would write such rubbish.

    In the first paragraph, the writer states:

    There was a time in this nation not too long ago when girls and women had no public voice. When they spoke about inequity or abuse they were told to shut up. They were publicly shamed into submission. They were called b*tches, nags, over-dramatic scolds. Women were what men said they were and were expected to act, dress and think accordingly. They were expected to behave themselves.

    I find that to be something of a typical strawman argument, the type of which leftists often use. Men and women have called each other names for a long time and most of the time this had nothing to do with one’s “voice.” But the writer did unconsciously(?) tell the truth in the last sentence. Behaving oneself is something leftists and libertarians have a great deal of trouble with.
    Of course, for a society to function half-way decently, “behaving oneself” is important. But don’t let facts get in the way of polemics.

    I thought the last paragraph was particularly stupid.

    Everyone should feel free to live as they choose and as who they choose, but not at the expense of the freedom of another. Women have fought too hard for too long for the ability to excel on our own terms. It is inconceivable that in 2019 we are once again in a place where that right is being threatened.

    I find the assertion of the first sentence to be questionable, but let’s stipulate it as true. They still do not have the right to expect anyone else should agree with said lifestyle, much less pamper and give way to the (often) insane lifestyle choices made by many mentally unbalanced people.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *