Does Barack Obama Have Blood on His Hands?

SellwynThumbby Selwyn Duke   11/3/14
Little Eli Waller will never grow up to be president. The four-year-old New Jersey boy will never grow up to be anything because enterovirus D68 took his life — quite possibly because a boy who did grow up to be president, but not really a man, invited the virus into our country.

How many American children have to die in deference to the Democrats’ voter-importation, demographic-warfare effort? We often hear that you have to break a few eggs to make an omelet, but how much Ebola, enterovirus D68 (EV-D68), Chagas Disease, malaria and tuberculosis is an acceptable price to pay to maintain Barack Obama’s open-borders-über-alles policy? These are relevant questions now, especially with a recent report confirming what was always just common sense:

The deadly EV-D68 epidemic in America was likely the result of Obama’s insistence on flooding our country with tens of thousands of illegal-alien minors.

Reports Neil Munro at The Daily Caller, “The evidence includes admissions from top health officials that the epidemic included multiple strains of the virus, and that it appeared simultaneously in multiple independent locations.”

This isn’t something hard to prove or disprove. All you need do is ascertain if the strain prevalent in the US is the same as one found south of the border. This is simple epidemiology, and there’s only one reason we don’t know:

The powers that be don’t want us to know.

Can you imagine the revolutionary uproar that would have ensued if, just when EV-D68 was big in the news, it had been revealed that Obama’s lawless abdication of his responsibility had led to American deaths?

Can you imagine what would be said if it were proven that Obama has blood on his hands?

And let’s consider the EV-D68 toll to this point. As Munro writes:

So far, that virus has been found in nine people — including at least three American kids — who died from illness. It has apparently inflicted unprecedented polio-like paralysis in roughly 50 kids, and it has put hundreds of young American kids into hospital emergency wards and intensive care units throughout more than 40 states. Most of the dead have not been publicly identified.

This, not to mention the toll taken by Ebola and the others diseases brought in by Obama’s strengthening diversifiers.

And how serious is the conspiracy of silence on the EV-D68 issue? Munro reports that a “series of government researchers, health experts and academics refused to comment, or else urged self-censorship, when they were pressed by TheDC for statistical and scientific data that would exonerate Obama and his deputies.” One of these is Columbia University researcher and top EV-D68 expert Rafal Tokarz, who, as he put it, “would really rather not comment.” Another is Professor Lone Simonsen, research director of George Washington University’s Global Epidemiology Program, whose cop-out was, “I would just steer away from that — it is not helpful, so why bring it up?”

Answer: because if Americans know that a given policy allowed EV-D68’s spread, they’ll realize the policy isn’t helpful and needs to be changed.

But this certainly is not helpful to Simonsen. As Munro pointed out, perpetuating the invasion of our country “is a top priority for the Democratic leaders, who have the power to make life difficult for grant-dependent American scientists who discover politically damaging information.”

Money, by the way, is part of the root of today’s scientific evil. As to the significance of this factor, consider that BMJ.com (formerly the British Medical Journal) reported in 2012, “One in seven UK based scientists or doctors has witnessed colleagues intentionally altering or fabricating data during their research or for the purposes of publication….” (In case you were wondering, this is how you get Al Gorleone’s gaggle of greedy global-warming gangsters.)

So we have here a confluence of scientific malpractice and political malpractice. And this brings us to Munro’s quoting of scientist and Enterovirus Foundation board member Nora Chapman: “Epidemics happen when populations mix, or when viruses mutate and combine to overcome peoples’ evolved immune defenses….”

Or when populations are mixed.

As when a president seeds various parts of the country with his carriers and redistributes disease. Hey, why keep the epidemic all in one place?

But don’t expend all your energy worrying about EV-D68 — save some of it for worrying about Ebola, of which scientists now predict there will be approximately 130 US cases by year’s end.

And how many next year?

How much blood will Obama have on his hands then?

If you think the ObamaCare disaster is bad, wait ’til you see the one wrought by ObamaDoesn’tCare.


Contact Selwyn Duke, follow him on Twitter or log on to SelwynDuke.com • (1191 views)

Share
This entry was posted in Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to Does Barack Obama Have Blood on His Hands?

  1. Anniel says:

    Obama “grew up to be president, by not really a man.” Unfortunately that is also true of some of the bought and paid for “scientists” in the world who preen their feathers while lying to everyone.

    • Rosalys says:

      There are rare, inherited conditions which produce premature aging. Unfortunately, in our present era there is a socially transmitted condition which retards mental maturity. It is called Progressivism.

  2. Timothy Lane says:

    “You can’t make an omelet without breaking eggs.” A very popular leftist notion, used to justify crimes such as the Ukrainian terror famine. But in Don Quixote, USA, Arthur Peabody Goodpasture pointed out in response that there’s a difference between breaking eggs and breaking people. But, unfortunately, not to leftists such as Barack Screwtape Obama.

    • Anniel says:

      Timothy, On your recommendation I read “Don Quixote USA.” Loved every nostalgic and funny moment of it. Sometimes the easiest truths are the hardest for people to “get”, such as the breaking eggs metaphor. Even Whittaker Chambers seemed to find that reasonable at first.

      Does Obama have blood on his hands? Even his most ardent supporters will have to acknowledge that one day. Maybe some of them will even mourn for their part in the blood-letting.

      • Rosalys says:

        I just looked up “Don Quixote USA” on Amazon. It must be a collector’s item because used copies – even in paperback – are going for $50! Looks like I’m going to be reading the library copy. I just put in a request.

        Thanks for the recommendation. I’m always looking for something good to read.

        • Timothy Lane says:

          An outstanding book (one of my early articles here was a review of it). I can also recommend several others by Powell, including The Philadelphian, The Soldier, Pioneer Go Home, and Whom the Gods Destroy.

    • Kung Fu Zu Kung Fu Zu says:

      From the first time I heard it, the eggs/omelet analogy has been a revealing expression of how Leftists view people as merely ingredients for their totalitarian gimcrack goals.

      I first heard this as something Mao said, but I believe it goes back to the French Revolution.

  3. Rosalys says:

    Does Barack Obama Have Blood on His Hands?

    In a word, YES!

    I am gobsmacked, speechless when I sit back and think about what We the People have allowed to happen to our country!

  4. NAHALKIDES NAHALKIDES says:

    Stunning piece by Selwyn, although of course we’ve heard some stories of illness following the importation of infectious aliens. The Daily Caller can’t do it alone – we need every journalist left in the country, people who care about the truth, to track down the source of each infectious outbreak and finally pin this on Obama if, as is likely, he’s responsible because of his open-borders policy.

    • Timothy Lane says:

      Unfortunately, most “news” sources serve up propaganda rather than information, and their cause favors unlimited immigration — a cause that would be hurt by reporting the truth about many immigrants. And it’s not like liberals care what happens to ordinary Americans, after all.

  5. Brad Nelson Brad Nelson says:

    So we have here a confluence of scientific malpractice and political malpractice.

    Everything Selwyn has said about medical and global warming issues pertains to neo-Darwinism as well. Simple truths are no longer stated, either because they run against one’s world view/religion or because you’ll be punished in some way by the political powers-that-be. We’re seeing not only the Religion of Leftism playing out; we’re also seeing how government itself is inherently corrupting when it wields too much power.

    But one of the Religion of Leftism’s primary dogmas is that government power — and in unlimited amounts — is needed to forward their program. And this program is said to be the solution to all that ails us, which is why this unlimited powers is considered to be justified. And this is what nearly a majority of people today believe. And you can understand this is so because it has become a mainstream belief that to cut government is to be “uncompassionate” in some way. If you don’t vote for subsidizing people’s sex lives you are engaging in “A war on women.” And on and on regarding every issue under the sun. If you are against funding some scheme, you are deemed by this culture to be morally and intellectually suspect.

    That polls show that a large majority of Americans believe in restricting flights from countries with Ebola shows that at least the most basic instinct for self-preservation hasn’t been totally overridden. But in terms of who these same people will continue to vote for, it might as well be overridden, in practice. They have proven to be powerless in the face of the virus of Marxism/Progressivism.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *