What is American conservatism?

by Brad Nelson   4/15/14

In regards to conservatism, there is much ignorance about what that means, particularly among many libertarians (not to mention the willful ignorance of many of today’s Republicans and their establishment mouthpieces). With the help of the StubbornThing’s brain trust, let me reiterate the main points as I see them:

What is American conservatism?

1) Reverence for the wisdom of the Founders, for the thoughts that went into the making of the Constitution, and for Western Civilization itself
2) A belief in limited government as the best guarantor of liberty
3) A belief that there are objective principles in regards to politics, society, human nature, and man’s relationship to the Eternal
4) Utopia is not an option
5) All harm cannot be ameliorated, nor should it be — it is inherent to living a life worth living that man must struggle and often fail
6) All governance should be done at the most local level possible
7) Belief in a pluralistic society that is organized under some general philosophies of life and a generally shared identity (aka “E Pluribus Unum”)
8) The private sector is the lifeblood of any good society — we are a people who have a government, and not the other way around
9) Only a moral people can hold onto freedom
10) Freedom, not equality, is what we are about
11) The law of unintended consequences must be respected
12) All things have costs — everything is a matter of making trade-offs
14) Private property is the basis of a good, fair, and productive society
15) We are to be ruled by laws, not the arbitrary dictates of men or unelected bureaucracies, and such laws should be clear and made without undue haste or zealousness
16) What Nik Said
17) In order to avoid tyranny, there should be a diffusion of power, including a diffusion into an executive, legislative, and judicial branches where each branch will not usurp the purview of the other
18) Man is more than just another animal and owes a duty to a Good above himself that is neither egotistical nor fascist in nature
19) The common touch: A conservative understands that we all put our pants on one leg at a time. Better-than-thou elitism has no place.

Where would libertarianism disagree? Note that most of the above are general principles of governance (restrictions on governance and/or general guides for governance, not grand purposes for governance). It is therefore assumed by conservatives that most people are fit to run their own lives, and should. Government is not viewed as the lifeblood of society. Government is necessary but should be carefully leashed. Man is a corrupt being and his corruption is easily amplified via the powers of government. This is a conservative truth.

Also, I did not delineate the basic moral codes of Western Civilization, including articulating the Ten Commandments (such as “Thou shall not steal”). But we can no longer take this basic moral code for granted and it should be articulated. Libertarians seem to think they have found an amazing new principle when they reiterate “thou shall not steal.” And it’s nice that they agree with that point, but what of all the others?

The Left is completely contrary to every one of the points above. And very often this is simply their desire to be contrary, to crash existing mores and institutions in order to increment their own power. This is the Lucifer element: There are many who would rather rule in hell than serve in heaven.

But there is also an entirely different worldview that lies at the base of these two views. And it really is a simple as the difference between seeing humanity as a mainly optimistic moral agent who must generally make his own way in the world in order to express his humanity and the gift of life — vs. the pessimistic view which is that man can’t possibly make it on his own and needs to subsume himself inside an authoritarian collectivism, substituting his moral and intellectual independence for that of the state which will presumably protect him.

Libertarians, at least on paper, do reject collectivism. But instead of seeing their lives in some larger context, this rejection seems to have more to do with unalloyed egotism than anything else….getting back to one of the fundamental points above: Is man nothing more than just another animal? Is his primary purpose in life little more than to scratch every itch as it comes up? If this is so, then libertarianism, as I suspect it is, is an atomizing force in society and therefore cannot ever be the grounding for a stable and good society.

So perhaps we conservatives are a bit like the Left in that we believe in a purpose other than just getting stoned. As I’ve said about the Left before, they are evil but at least they believe in something. It’s the wrong thing, but man must have noble ambitions or he rots.
__________________________________________________
Have a blog post you want to share? Click here. • (990 views)

Share
Brad Nelson

About Brad Nelson

I like books, nature, politics, old movies, Ronald Reagan (you get sort of a three-fer with that one), and the founding ideals of this country. We are the Shining City on the Hill — or ought to be. However, our land has been poisoned by Utopian aspirations and feel-good bromides. Both have replaced wisdom and facts.
This entry was posted in Blog Post. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to What is American conservatism?

  1. Kung Fu Zu Kung Fu Zu says:

    “When law becomes a politicized weapon rather than a reflection of society’s shared principles, one can no longer expect it to be revered in a manner befitting “political religion.” And when the officials trusted to execute law faithfully violate laws regularly, they lose their presumption of legitimacy”

    This is from a post by Andrew McCarthy at NRO today. I think it covers much of what is going on in the USA and is why many are losing respect for the government.

    A good example of such lawlessness, i.e. making the law a politicized weapon, is the finding by several courts that State laws regarding marriage to be unconstitutional. The Sodomite mafia bend and contort the law into anything that will give them power. That this is lawless doesn’t bother them in the least. And the so-called Libertarians who support them because of “freedom” clearly don’t, in practice, support freedoms which they don’t agree with. It is now perfectly clear that many more people’s rights will be trod on than will take advantage of deviant marriage.

    Next to come, marriage between deviants and sheep. Landlords will have to make allowance for such “married couples” by allowing the planting of grass in their tenements. And singing “Bah, Bah Black Sheep” will be prosecutable as a hate crime.

    • Brad Nelson Brad Nelson says:

      You got all of that one, Mr. Kung.

    • Timothy Lane says:

      For that matter, within a decade I suspect that pedophilia will be an accepted perversion among liberals who today still abominate it. When the NAMBLA types (already supported by the Wicked Witch of the West) argue for it, they will have no argument against it because the moral argument is unavailable to them.

      As for the Bundys (which I discussed in many places myself), I’ve said the same thing in many places. The Obama Gang’s lawlessness has forfeited their right to expect others to obey the law more than they do.

  2. Leigh Bravo says:

    Let us not forget the rules of the left under Alinsky!

    Saul David Alinsky (January 30, 1909 – June 12, 1972) was an American community organizer and writer. He is generally considered to be the founder of modern community organizing. He authored the book, “Rules for Radicals”.

    In his book, he details the eight 8 levels of control that must be obtained in order to create a social state.

    The first is the most important.

    1) Healthcare: Control healthcare and you control the people.

    2) Poverty: Increase the Poverty level as high as possible. Poor people are easier to control, and will not fight back as long as you are providing everything they require to live.

    3) Debt: Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. In this way, taxes must increase, and this will produce more poverty.

    4) Gun Control: Remove the ability for citizens to defend themselves from the Government. In that way you are able to create a police state.

    5) Welfare: Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income).

    6) Education: Take control of what children read and to what they are taught in school.

    7) Religion: Remove the belief in the God from the Government and schools.

    8) Class Warfare: Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent, and it will be easier to tax the wealthy with the support of the poor.

    • Timothy Lane says:

      I’ve seen some defenders of Alinsky argue that he was no fan of Big Government (perhaps more of a collectivist anarchist). But that hardly matters, because his points work whether he wanted those to happen or not.

    • Brad Nelson Brad Nelson says:

      A dastardly plan. And one that the Democrats are carrying out under the banner of “compassion.” They will “help” us all the way to the gulags.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *